My ex and I split, sold the marital home and had agreed (verbally) that it was best for our children that we remain in the same end of town so that their school would not change.
Our separation turned nasty after my ex denied access to the kids for 2 months before we agreed to interim 50/50 and joint custody at a case conference in November.
All along my ex has been making claims of child abuse against me, alcoholism, spousal assault etc etc. She has accused me of spousal assault and had me falsely arrested. I was released without charge and the police stated in their report that they didn't believe her.
My ex has tried to alienate me from the children by badmouthing me, reading my 10 year old her affidavit, and blaming me for the whole separation. I have taken the high road and don't talk bad about her to the kids.....which really pisses me off inside but it's something I need to do.
I recently purchased a home in the same neighborhood as the kids current school and my ex decided to move to another part of the city and expects the kids school and day care to change as well. She denies that we ever agreed to stay in our current area.
My ex is asking for a change of schools to her area, sole custody, full CS for 2 kids, Spousal support, and 60% of section 7 expenses. Her salary is 67% of my salary and she works shift work. She states in her affidavit that due to her shift work she will have her mother and friends watch the children. I work 9-5 Monday - Friday.
At our settlement conference the judge ruled in favour of my proposal to have a 50/50 joint custody arrangement with 7 days on and 7 days off. I told the judge that I would agree to move the kids school to her neighborhood and that all I wanted was a stable consistent access schedule where both kids could have lots of time with either parent.
My ex scoffed at the ruling and will not sign minutes of settlement and has proceeded to book a motion date for early September just before school starts.
I am worried. I know that the judge who sits in at the settlement conference cannot hear the motion so the ruling could be completely different.
Is it common for a different judge to view the facts completely different and rule is a very different manner than the settlement conference judge?
This woman is pushing me to the brink of bankruptcy. We both just bought new homes. Hers is more expensive than mine and I have no idea how she is affording the legal fees. She has no respect for me as the kids father and doesn't care about whether or not I can still provide for our kids anymore.
Thanks
Our separation turned nasty after my ex denied access to the kids for 2 months before we agreed to interim 50/50 and joint custody at a case conference in November.
All along my ex has been making claims of child abuse against me, alcoholism, spousal assault etc etc. She has accused me of spousal assault and had me falsely arrested. I was released without charge and the police stated in their report that they didn't believe her.
My ex has tried to alienate me from the children by badmouthing me, reading my 10 year old her affidavit, and blaming me for the whole separation. I have taken the high road and don't talk bad about her to the kids.....which really pisses me off inside but it's something I need to do.
I recently purchased a home in the same neighborhood as the kids current school and my ex decided to move to another part of the city and expects the kids school and day care to change as well. She denies that we ever agreed to stay in our current area.
My ex is asking for a change of schools to her area, sole custody, full CS for 2 kids, Spousal support, and 60% of section 7 expenses. Her salary is 67% of my salary and she works shift work. She states in her affidavit that due to her shift work she will have her mother and friends watch the children. I work 9-5 Monday - Friday.
At our settlement conference the judge ruled in favour of my proposal to have a 50/50 joint custody arrangement with 7 days on and 7 days off. I told the judge that I would agree to move the kids school to her neighborhood and that all I wanted was a stable consistent access schedule where both kids could have lots of time with either parent.
My ex scoffed at the ruling and will not sign minutes of settlement and has proceeded to book a motion date for early September just before school starts.
I am worried. I know that the judge who sits in at the settlement conference cannot hear the motion so the ruling could be completely different.
Is it common for a different judge to view the facts completely different and rule is a very different manner than the settlement conference judge?
This woman is pushing me to the brink of bankruptcy. We both just bought new homes. Hers is more expensive than mine and I have no idea how she is affording the legal fees. She has no respect for me as the kids father and doesn't care about whether or not I can still provide for our kids anymore.
Thanks
Comment