From my own research and reading of the law, I understand that judge/court would always like to keep siblings together when awarding child custody.
How would court/judge consider for half-sisters? Say if one parent has a daughter from a previous marriage, and has a smaller child from a new relationship, and the two kids are about 10 years old apart. Who will get the custody of the toddler when the parents break-up if all other factors are about the same? The teenage girl would automatically stay with her biological parent who has the sole custody. And if applying the ‘To the best interest of the child’ doctrine, the younger child would be better off staying with her half-sister and hence being awarded to the same parent.
Are these assumptions valid? Or does this fact of having a half-sister play a role in such a case? If so this would put the other parent of the younger child into a disadvantage situation to start with, right?
Are there any case laws dealing with such matters?
How would court/judge consider for half-sisters? Say if one parent has a daughter from a previous marriage, and has a smaller child from a new relationship, and the two kids are about 10 years old apart. Who will get the custody of the toddler when the parents break-up if all other factors are about the same? The teenage girl would automatically stay with her biological parent who has the sole custody. And if applying the ‘To the best interest of the child’ doctrine, the younger child would be better off staying with her half-sister and hence being awarded to the same parent.
Are these assumptions valid? Or does this fact of having a half-sister play a role in such a case? If so this would put the other parent of the younger child into a disadvantage situation to start with, right?
Are there any case laws dealing with such matters?
Comment