Originally posted by frustrated11
View Post
1. Because she works full time, she doesn't have time to allocate to the court process and as a result felt obligated to retain a lawyer to assist in the court proceedings.
2. She borrowed "substantial" amounts of money to cover her legal fees associated with this case and is now in great debt.
3. Unable to take out more loans, she had to dismiss her lawyer and represent herself.
4. She had to take time off work in order to learn and follow the correct court procedures.
5. My husband's request for a reduction in child support due to his loss of employment was "premature" as he still made close to the same amount for 2008 on which his previous child support amount was based (duh, he lost his job end of October - and only obtained employment this month) and he continued paying that previously ordered amount (duh, because it was automatically withdrawn from his account by FRO on a monthly basis and he could do nothing about it without a court order).
6. My husband's conduct in attempting to obtain changes through a 14B motion (when she and her lawyer failed to file and serve the necessary paperwork), causing her to incur further legal costs, also needs to be taken account in determining his responsibility to pay her costs in this case.
Like... WTF?! Really?! I shake my head in frustration.
All we ever wanted was to get a fair reduction in child support due to my husband's termination of employment... and here she is throwing curveballs. Grrr!
Leave a comment: