Originally posted by arbortrail22
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Child Support headache
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by StillPaying View PostYou're asking the court system and fro to change their system for you. They don't want to enforce 1 payer let alone 2.
All you need are the details. Applicant pays x based on xx income. Respondent paid y based on yy income.
Then you're allowed to have "offset" or only one party as "payer", etc and still receive cra shared benefits.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I believe this is more old school thinking; where people left out the details and only had the final - parent a pays b x amount in offset.
If you also mention that parent b pays a x amount based on xx income, then there's no issue.
No need for parent a to pay 900 and parent b pay 400, just so parent b hopefully gets their 500.
Also, if you're paying through fro, it's a bill payment with no memo - not an etransfer. And who uses cheques anymore!?
Comment
-
Originally posted by StillPaying View PostI believe this is more old school thinking; where people left out the details and only had the final - parent a pays b x amount in offset.
If you also mention that parent b pays a x amount based on xx income, then there's no issue.
No need for parent a to pay 900 and parent b pay 400, just so parent b hopefully gets their 500.
Also, if you're paying through fro, it's a bill payment with no memo - not an etransfer. And who uses cheques anymore!?
Each parent must pay the other and be able to show the CRA that the exchange happened.
Comment
-
I assume that's where you got your other "basic stuff" answered on filing your offers with 6b's...
The devil is in the details.
In the above example, parent a would pay $500 as a set off amount. They wouldn't show a $900 transfer neither would parent b show $400. However, since it's ordered/shown how/why only $500 is being transferred in the shared situation, CRA would have no issue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StillPaying View PostI assume that's where you got your other "basic stuff" answered on filing your offers with 6b's...
The devil is in the details.
In the above example, parent a would pay $500 as a set off amount. They wouldn't show a $900 transfer neither would parent b show $400. However, since it's ordered/shown how/why only $500 is being transferred in the shared situation, CRA would have no issue.
https://globalnews.ca/news/4184196/e...d-benefit-cra/
https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/tcc/doc...?resultIndex=1
Are there any details from legislation, Canlii or the CRA rulings that say otherwise?
Comment
Comment