Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

B.C court bars mother from seeing daughter

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AtALoss
    replied
    I am just glad to see that there is getting some ackowledgement to this issue. The way I see it is that can happen from either side. Utimately it is unfair to the child and they are the one who is hurt by this kind of behaviour from a parent.

    Leave a comment:


  • dadtotheend
    replied
    Wow, there's another one. This gives hope to alienated parents. Rock on Canadian justices!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kimberley
    started a topic B.C court bars mother from seeing daughter

    B.C court bars mother from seeing daughter

    I read this story this morning and thought I would post it for everyone.


    <table style="clear: both; margin-top: 15px;" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="1" width="125"> <tbody><tr><td width="8"></td><td><script type="text/javascript"> fctAdTag("bigbox",MyGenericTagVar,1); </script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/can.en.canoe.news/canada;tile=3;sz=300x250;pos=1;hp=1;ord=1860543350 ?"></script>

    </td></tr> </tbody></table>
    VANCOUVER, B.C. - In a case of extreme parental alienation, a mother has been banned by a B.C. Supreme Court judge from seeing her teenage daughter for more than a year.
    Because of the urgency of the matter, Justice Donna Martinson issued the terse, two-page ruling outlining 15 conditions the parents must follow, including that the mother, known only as Ms. A, not see her daughter until at least March 31, 2010.
    The decision came after the mother alleged extreme emotional abuse by the father, which she claimed was putting the teen's safety at risk.
    "I am satisfied that Ms. A's allegations are unfounded," Martinson wrote. "I am further satisfied that she has continued to undermine the relationship between M and her father and has acted in ways that are detrimental to M's psychological healing."
    Names have been stripped from the court ruling to protect the girl's identity.
    The judge has ordered that both the mother and maternal grandmother have no contact with the girl, which would be enforced by police if necessary.
    The court has also ordered the mother to pay $320 per month for the girl's counselling, on top of the child support she is already paying.
    Jessica Ko, the lawyer for the girl's father, said it's been a gruelling road for the dad who has been in court 17 different times to gain access to his daughter or defend himself against the mother's allegations.
    "It went to the point where our client was essentially bankrupt from defending himself and pursuing this legal matter," said Ko.
    She said the father is in a highly respected profession and should be able to recover financially.
    Ko said the ruling banning the mother from any contact with the child was extremely unusual, because often the court attempts to find a balance in access between the parents.
    "This is a case where there was found to be an extreme example of parental alienation by the mother towards the father."
Our Divorce Forums
Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
Working...
X