Hello Everyone,
I am going through custody/access and equalization payment procedure through the Ontario court system. We had a case conference where OCL was ordered for our children ages 13 and 17. They have been residing with their father for a year but our 13 year old daughter wants to live with me and her father refuses, so judge ordered OCL to represent. Equalization of family property will be determined in the near future. Father makes over 100K and I make 35K, and he says he won't pay me a dime, and during case conference he practically told judge she didn't know what she was talking about because she told me I should be applying for spousal support. I don't care about the money, just the effect this is having on my children.
I have made an offer as follows: Daughter to reside with me, Son with father. No child support to be given by either and no equalization payment to be paid. Access will be as often as each of us want to see children, with reasonable notice.
If the offer is refused, how is this looked upon by the judge?
I am going through custody/access and equalization payment procedure through the Ontario court system. We had a case conference where OCL was ordered for our children ages 13 and 17. They have been residing with their father for a year but our 13 year old daughter wants to live with me and her father refuses, so judge ordered OCL to represent. Equalization of family property will be determined in the near future. Father makes over 100K and I make 35K, and he says he won't pay me a dime, and during case conference he practically told judge she didn't know what she was talking about because she told me I should be applying for spousal support. I don't care about the money, just the effect this is having on my children.
I have made an offer as follows: Daughter to reside with me, Son with father. No child support to be given by either and no equalization payment to be paid. Access will be as often as each of us want to see children, with reasonable notice.
If the offer is refused, how is this looked upon by the judge?
Comment