14C confirmation

[podric]

Thank you all.


A date is not set but one can come down from up high any day due to a procedural motion.



There is a 14B motion to waive Rule 39 and set a specific date for DRO CC that may get sunk because the lawyer didn't serve me before filing after they failed to file correctly the first time. I did file a late response and asked for a different date. That is in another thread.
I am not prepared because this month I have too much going on with end of year audit and an unexpected residential location item. They OC knew this and is trying to set a date they know I am less likely to be prepared for.

Before this they delayed for months, now they are in a hurry....riiiight.



In between my filing a response the medical appointment was setup.


I did call the trial co-coordinator and informed them that I am unavailable but did not leave specific instructions.


If none of this sounds normal, welcome to the party.

[rockscan]

14C confirmation

Thank you. I will add clarity.


I haven't seen a judge but a judge was asked to set the same single date by other party via procedural motion.

SP and blink said pretty much what I was saying that the clerk sets the time.

Your clarity item also points out that you need to stop stressing about what the other side might do. The beauty of Canadian courts is that you get a say too so just because the other side files a request to have something on a set date, you have the opportunity to argue why that date won’t work.

Not to mention the judge may not be available on the date they want.

Just because the other side wants something doesn’t mean they automatically get it. And I’m not attacking you. Any court is difficult whether it is family or otherwise. It is easy to get panicked and worried about what ifs. What you need to remember is the ex and her lawyer do not control the court. They won’t get what they want just because they want it. You will have an opportunity to argue against it.

[podric]

It is very clear to me that Blinkandimgone and Stillpaying said something much different than Rockscan did and did so with grace.


What I did was notify the other lawyer and trial co-coordinator office to give them a heads up and to show that I was unavailable before a date was set. Now I wait and see if it becomes a problem. I won't be prepared if it does.



It would seem perverse that people can file late, lie and not disclose even if they are far out of the timelines and do so without penalty but I can't change a DRO CC date so I can get a medical procedure done this year when next year is risking being too late courts could wait but God can't/won't. Those dates are plentiful.

[rockscan]

It is very clear to me that Blinkandimgone and Stillpaying said something much different than Rockscan did and did so with grace.

Considering you can’t figure out the clearest of things on a good day, this isn’t an insult. You just didn’t like what I had to say.

What I did was notify the other lawyer and trial co-coordinator office to give them a heads up and to show that I was unavailable before a date was set. Now I wait and see if it becomes a problem. I won't be prepared if it does.

Not sure why you didn’t lead with this in your question. Why was it so difficult to simply say you advised the other parties and trial co-ordinator? Why do you have such an issue with giving the full picture? (Those are rhetorical, I know the answer.)

It would seem perverse that people can file late, lie and not disclose even if they are far out of the timelines and do so without penalty but I can't change a DRO CC date so I can get a medical procedure done this year when next year is risking being too late courts could wait but God can't/won't. Those dates are plentiful.

No one said you couldn’t change it and if it came to be that the matter was scheduled for that time and you couldn’t get the other party to agree, you could have had a lawyer go, tell the judge your child was in surgery and let the judge blast the other parent for being callous.

Like I (and Stillpaying) said, you are overthinking things and worrying about what may or may not happen.

[podric]

Considering you can�t figure out the clearest of things on a good day, this isn�t an insult. You just didn�t like what I had to say.

That is the only extra bit from you I needed to read.


Shutup Rockscan, stay in your lane. In real life I wouldn't tolerate your Karen crap and blast you. Go out and get some air you keyboard warrior.

[podric]

Sent a private message to Rockscan telling them to Stay in their lane and returned their insult on intelligence......they reported me for harassment!!!

Originally Posted by podric
Keep your toxic responses and responses devoid of intelligence on the Family Law system away from me.
You want to post fine, back your shit with web references but you can't.


I used to be in a relationship with someone a lot like you. They made it hell for people around them but their personality or intelligence wouldn't allow them to see or accept that.

Stay in your lane and keep that tongue in your mouth.
I seriously doubt this is clear enough for you but will ask. Clear?

Rockscan reply

And now Ive reported you for harassment. Good luck in your case!!

What type of person keeps pushing and delivering insults until they are told to get lost and get insulted just so they can file a complaint?



I am keeping this thread on my HD with all those rockscan insults and confusion for future reference because last time they were deleted, as they should. Classic.

[blinkandimgone]

This post is now locked.

Podric, Rockscan said the same that SP and I both said.

You don't get to PM people for the sole purpose of harassing them. This stops now.