Ex filed an appeal based on some points that I (and my lawyer) feel are insignificant.
One includes, "Ineffective assistance of counsel. Evidence that was in possession of the Applicant's counsel in advance of the trial was not presented." Whatever that evidence may be, I am not concerned. I know there is no "smoking gun" out there that could have a material impact on the decision.
Now, my lawyer and I walked through the trial prep together and I knew what her plan was. I had input, suggestions, etc and we presented our case. In many instances, I deferred to her expertise - that's why I'm paying her - and in some, she included information that I felt needed to be heard.
How much of the onus is on the parties in the trial to ensure their lawyer is properly acting on their behalf? I would suspect a large portion?
Funnily enough, her new lawyer is a criminal attorney with seemingly zero family law experience. Certainly nothing in CANLII nor on their own website.
One includes, "Ineffective assistance of counsel. Evidence that was in possession of the Applicant's counsel in advance of the trial was not presented." Whatever that evidence may be, I am not concerned. I know there is no "smoking gun" out there that could have a material impact on the decision.
Now, my lawyer and I walked through the trial prep together and I knew what her plan was. I had input, suggestions, etc and we presented our case. In many instances, I deferred to her expertise - that's why I'm paying her - and in some, she included information that I felt needed to be heard.
How much of the onus is on the parties in the trial to ensure their lawyer is properly acting on their behalf? I would suspect a large portion?
Funnily enough, her new lawyer is a criminal attorney with seemingly zero family law experience. Certainly nothing in CANLII nor on their own website.
Comment