Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Approach for finances in Mediation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Approach for finances in Mediation

    Scenario

    2012, S7 to be split near 50/50 as incomes are similar
    2013, I start paying all S7 finances because ex is having money troubles
    2014, ex runs finances into the ground and declares bankruptcy
    2015, no more daycare being used
    2015, both myself and ex in dual income homes but I'm still paying all S7 expenses for extra curricular activities because "she just doesn't have any money"

    In 2014 I received a retroactive lump sum payment for contract renegotiation (present and future year income will not mimic this amount, but the CS adjust back to a lower amount will take a full year).

    Moving into Mediation, this is the what she seems to have in mind:

    She will not pay any Section 7 Expenses for extracurricular activities because she has no money, but she does expect me to pay the increase in child support ($80-$180). If I can't afford to pay for the activities "they just can't do them"

    Result for myself and the girls: I cannot afford to pay %100 of the girls activities (amount to about $4000 a year) as well as the increased child support amount as again, a good portion of last years lump sum retro payment went to cover the activities and my PRESENT salary is far less than what my PRESENT CS amount would lend you to think.

    I know that household incomes only come into play in rare occasions (undue hardship etc)....but is it reasonable that ex, living in a dual income home, who has ruined her finances is able to say that she will not, in any way help with activities but collect full CS? I

    Note that the cost of the activities have gone up significantly, but they the intitial cost (approximately half of what they are now) had been agreed to in the original order)

    Thanks, Trix

  • #2
    don't go in with the attitude of giving her what she wants, you have S7 50/50 in writing from 2012. stick to it and demand retroactive. if she is unable to pay the retro C7 then try to get CS to stay where it is until that amount is off set. then insist on having her pay S7 going forwards. I believe her expenses will be irrelevant if the matter of s7 goes to a judge and i believe she will be ordered to pay retroactive with interest.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Trix View Post
      2015, both myself and ex in dual income homes but I'm still paying all S7 expenses for extra curricular activities because "she just doesn't have any money"
      Why doesn't she have any money? Is she employed?

      Originally posted by Trix View Post
      I know that household incomes only come into play in rare occasions (undue hardship etc)....but is it reasonable that ex, living in a dual income home, who has ruined her finances is able to say that she will not, in any way help with activities but collect full CS?
      Don't bother taking the dual income slant. As you said, it's only applicable to undue hardship claims. Even then, comparing household incomes is not the factor that determines undue hardship; rather, it's just a check system the courts use to avoid reducing CS obligations for a payor who has a higher household standard of living than the recipient's household. Sort of off topic...

      Back on topic...does she work? If so, she should be disclosing her annual income to you and she should be paying S7 expenses in proportion to both your individual incomes.

      If she doesn't work, why not? There may be a valid reason for it, but deciding not to work because the new partner makes enough for both of them is not a valid reason. Income can be imputed to her, if necessary.
      Last edited by Teenwolf; 06-11-2015, 09:46 AM.

      Comment

      Our Divorce Forums
      Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
      Working...
      X