Tweet
Going to court in Late Dec
I will be going to court un represented for my divorce
Ihad a lawyer but the costs became to expensive
as there is an impending Bankrupcy I see no reason to pay a lawyer to prove I dont have any money
But I have been viewing divorce proceedings and at this point have noticed 2 things
1) The lawyer asking questions seems to be jumping all over, first asking some questions about the financials ,then about emails then back to financials ,psychology reports etc..
Is this standard practice to To confuse the witness?
2) The Judge asked one of the parties who was on the stand about who had contributed more to their joint rrsp
I thought that it wouldnt matter can any one explain why it is relevant?
Also I would ask for any links that any one has for case-law and also for the procedure and or techniques in questioning
Thank-you in advance
Ihad a lawyer but the costs became to expensive
as there is an impending Bankrupcy I see no reason to pay a lawyer to prove I dont have any money
But I have been viewing divorce proceedings and at this point have noticed 2 things
1) The lawyer asking questions seems to be jumping all over, first asking some questions about the financials ,then about emails then back to financials ,psychology reports etc..
Is this standard practice to To confuse the witness?
2) The Judge asked one of the parties who was on the stand about who had contributed more to their joint rrsp
I thought that it wouldnt matter can any one explain why it is relevant?
Also I would ask for any links that any one has for case-law and also for the procedure and or techniques in questioning
Thank-you in advance