Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
If the mediator specifically referred to the document as a MOU then, it is highly likely it is not a legally binding document. You would have had to have a mediated-arbitrated agreement and/or arbitrated agreement for it to be legally binding.
So, to get the MOU to be "legally binding" between both parties you need to make an official "Offer to Settle" in accordance with Rule 18 of the Family Law Rules. The other party has to accept your "Offer to Settle" in accordance with the Rule. Then you can proceed to make the separation agreement a court order by filing a motion on consent with the other party. Once the settlement agreement has been filed with the courts, then you can file it with the FRO.
With regards to the FRO and when they are appropriate to use... See my comments below.
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
The only time FRO should be used is when there is a non-payment issue and arrears. The FRO is often used by highly conflicted litigants often in an attempt to control the other parent often. This can add unnecessary conflict where the parties to the matter should be seeking settlement and being reasonable rather than attempting to use a government service to control the other parent.
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
For example, change in employment, lower income, higher income... You have to deal with a forms nightmare and putting forward orders all the time to get FRO to do anything to change. If you like paperwork and the conflict that comes with it... FRO is the way to GO.
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
My recommendation would be to avoid FRO until such time that the other parent has made your anxiety (worry) a reality through non-compliance. FRO should be a last resort "collections" agency in my opinion.
FRO doesn't remove conflict... More often than not... It creates conflict from what I see people posting here about it and what I read in case law.
In fact, there are a number of justices who will order specifically that the parties NOT use FRO in many cases these days.
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
Originally posted by KAH1976
View Post
Create and serve a simple "Offer to Settle" through registered mail.
The Offer to Settle should just state something very basic that both parties agree to the terms set forth in Schedule "A" attached and for this schedule to be a binding legal agreement to resolve all matters between person A and person B.
If it doesn't settle all matters you need to clearly identify what matters it settles.
In the alternative you can cut and paste the MOU and make necessary changes to turn it into a offer to settle in accordance with the Rules.
You may want to request that the mediator now become an arbitrator (if they are an arbitrator) and issue an order in accordance with the agreed upon MOU. (That is the fastest way to have it done if you can get the other party to agree to it.)
Good Luck!
Tayken
Leave a comment: