To Fair4ALL,
That is EXACTLY the point I am trying to get accross, but you said it in such a great way! Family Law in Canada is archaic, assuming that the women is the "victim" in every situation and allowing her liberties and choices that would never be allowed the man.
A lot of women don't play "victim", but if they want to, they have the full support of the family law system behind them. And they have excuses, usually agreed to by judges, for all of their actions. Excuses that would never fly for a man.
When is family law going to step up and understand women are competent and capable human beings and as such should be held to the same legal and financial standards that men are?
That is EXACTLY the point I am trying to get accross, but you said it in such a great way! Family Law in Canada is archaic, assuming that the women is the "victim" in every situation and allowing her liberties and choices that would never be allowed the man.
A lot of women don't play "victim", but if they want to, they have the full support of the family law system behind them. And they have excuses, usually agreed to by judges, for all of their actions. Excuses that would never fly for a man.
When is family law going to step up and understand women are competent and capable human beings and as such should be held to the same legal and financial standards that men are?
Comment