Has anyone had any experience with this Family Law Rule of being able to bring Motions to Expunge or Motions to Strike materials from a pending motion?
Summary: I'm bringing a Motion for Custody and Access, with pretty strong materials. Opposing counsel wants to strike some of if, what I'm presenting is pretty damaging, hence why they are trying to strike it.
Questions: The motion to strike must now be heard before my substantive motion, however opposing counsel is now saying they will NOT go to two motions and want to delay for a "long motion", which is several months out. Can they simply say NO, we will not go to two motions? Their tactics are obvious, they have nothing and want to delay to then try and falsely and deviously establish some made up status quo and try to argue with that later.
Any thoughts, advice analysis?
Thanks.
Summary: I'm bringing a Motion for Custody and Access, with pretty strong materials. Opposing counsel wants to strike some of if, what I'm presenting is pretty damaging, hence why they are trying to strike it.
Questions: The motion to strike must now be heard before my substantive motion, however opposing counsel is now saying they will NOT go to two motions and want to delay for a "long motion", which is several months out. Can they simply say NO, we will not go to two motions? Their tactics are obvious, they have nothing and want to delay to then try and falsely and deviously establish some made up status quo and try to argue with that later.
Any thoughts, advice analysis?
Thanks.
Comment