Choices made by couples when together are not the same choices they would make if they split up.
Roles are assumed for the sake of the family unit.
The Courts instead of saying "all bets are off" when couples separate lean toward the past and who was the primary caregiver.
And that's the problem.
Can a man breastfeed? If he can't do that then he better find something useful to do.
Maternity leave... this Trojan Horse guarantee's who will be a Primary Parent, it's often used against a parent later who worked so the couple could eat and have shelter.
The Courts don't recognize the new realities when relationships fall apart they use old realities.
A new reality is a child having to stay with somebody while the couples go to war....One parent gets/takes temporarily custody......in a 50-50 world it shouldn't matter who helped themselves to temporary custody....but it does for Judges in there determinations (why upset the status quo)
The other new reality is money "temporarily" (according to the tables) while the matter is being "worked out".
The saying... Never judge a "person" until you've walked a mile in the that persons shoe's" is fitting for any parent NOT shown the door in a relationship breakdown.
Time is used against a parent who has been shown the door, Courts use it against the rebuilding emotionally screwed up parent ALWAYS...when determining custody and access.
If 50-50 is presumed then the Court can't dwell in the couples PAST
The parent shown the door must be given a grace period to get re-established
the word SOLE CUSTODY should be abolished
Roles are assumed for the sake of the family unit.
The Courts instead of saying "all bets are off" when couples separate lean toward the past and who was the primary caregiver.
And that's the problem.
Can a man breastfeed? If he can't do that then he better find something useful to do.
Maternity leave... this Trojan Horse guarantee's who will be a Primary Parent, it's often used against a parent later who worked so the couple could eat and have shelter.
The Courts don't recognize the new realities when relationships fall apart they use old realities.
A new reality is a child having to stay with somebody while the couples go to war....One parent gets/takes temporarily custody......in a 50-50 world it shouldn't matter who helped themselves to temporary custody....but it does for Judges in there determinations (why upset the status quo)
The other new reality is money "temporarily" (according to the tables) while the matter is being "worked out".
The saying... Never judge a "person" until you've walked a mile in the that persons shoe's" is fitting for any parent NOT shown the door in a relationship breakdown.
Time is used against a parent who has been shown the door, Courts use it against the rebuilding emotionally screwed up parent ALWAYS...when determining custody and access.
If 50-50 is presumed then the Court can't dwell in the couples PAST
The parent shown the door must be given a grace period to get re-established
the word SOLE CUSTODY should be abolished
Comment