Wondering if anyone knows if an appointed lawyer for the children can successfully get a judge to force a party with access to agree to and take a child/ren to a specific activity at a specific place during their access time?
The background, one party has sole custody, the other access but in the original separation agreement is a paragraph that states in regards to major decisions that may affect the non custodial parent's access or extraordinary expenditures that the parties agree to joint decision making.
In this case, the custodial parent has had no discussion or response in regards to the non-custodial parent's suggestion that the activity occur elsewhere and instead has gotten the children's lawyer involved who is threatening a motion to push what the custodial parent wants instead through even though it breaks the joint decision making term of the separation agreement.
Please advise.
I don't wish to get into debates about why would one suggest going elsewhere for the activity (change), etc. There are more than enough concerns / value reasons and that is not what I seek clarity on.
Thanks all
The background, one party has sole custody, the other access but in the original separation agreement is a paragraph that states in regards to major decisions that may affect the non custodial parent's access or extraordinary expenditures that the parties agree to joint decision making.
In this case, the custodial parent has had no discussion or response in regards to the non-custodial parent's suggestion that the activity occur elsewhere and instead has gotten the children's lawyer involved who is threatening a motion to push what the custodial parent wants instead through even though it breaks the joint decision making term of the separation agreement.
Please advise.
I don't wish to get into debates about why would one suggest going elsewhere for the activity (change), etc. There are more than enough concerns / value reasons and that is not what I seek clarity on.
Thanks all
Comment