If you are in a high conflict divorce, why would any woman seek an alternative to court? The odds are in her favour to get custody and get the majority of access. Once that is established, the flood of money pours in.
It is correct that no law will change a person's attitude. If you are in a high conflict divorce, it is usually one person's attitude, or better said "their god given right" to have the kids, money, revenge, that is causing this high conflict. All these "laws" do is encourage this behaviour.
There are many places that are attempting to, or in the progress of, switching from these loosy-goosy "laws" to firm rules.
I think you are wrong that default joint custody and default joint access would not help mess of society called divorce. All this conflict is based on "kids are the prize".
Finally, I think your example of a "biased system" because a women must depend on the husand's support to survive, has nothing to do with THE SYSTEM. The SYSTEM is providing her. For her the SYSTEM works. Like most recipients though, some how it is never enough.
It is correct that no law will change a person's attitude. If you are in a high conflict divorce, it is usually one person's attitude, or better said "their god given right" to have the kids, money, revenge, that is causing this high conflict. All these "laws" do is encourage this behaviour.
There are many places that are attempting to, or in the progress of, switching from these loosy-goosy "laws" to firm rules.
I think you are wrong that default joint custody and default joint access would not help mess of society called divorce. All this conflict is based on "kids are the prize".
Finally, I think your example of a "biased system" because a women must depend on the husand's support to survive, has nothing to do with THE SYSTEM. The SYSTEM is providing her. For her the SYSTEM works. Like most recipients though, some how it is never enough.
Comment