Originally posted by LovingFather32
View Post
I don’t think everything you say is a conspiracy, why would you draw that conclusion? I believe you have that completely backwards - in fact, I firmly believe there are no conspiracies whatsoever in family law and I will friendly debate that with Mr. T for the next 10 years.
Originally posted by LovingFather32
View Post
It appears we will not ever agree on the current system and the Process first initiating child protection before ensuring parents’ rights to access. I’ve asked you for an opinion in a generic fashion several times now, but I see I’m not going to get that response. You also have avoided my question as to your potential response if the OCL report is unfavorable to you [remember, I don't think there is a conspiracy]. I do understand that at this moment your focus is on your child (as would mine be) and frankly, I intend for you to be very aware of the fact that I am not attacking you but attempting to make you aware of other possibilities.
We will also not ever agree on default 50-50 - one of the many reasons being precisely because non-reported abuse does happen in family homes and I believe the safety of the child is the priority. If the allegations in your case are false, I have posted here to you that I think the ex should be penalized, but let me make it quite clear, if default 50-50 puts children in abusive homes back at risk, I will never support it. And it does, so I won’t.
One of the other reasons I wouldn’t agree to default 50-50 is when a family home in the separation process involves a SAHP. Isn’t that your situation? I understood the fairly standard approach is that a SAHP continues to maintain the majority of access to maintain the child’s routine, while access is gradually increased to the the non-SAHP. Can you see that, or do you disagree? - this concern of mine appears to be missing from all of your threads, and it also appears to me that your current drive (and yes, your cheerleader) is focusing on proving negative parenting- but I’ll leave that to you and your online legal team to work with.
I'll also add, as I have already - the OCL report, given that it should contain both parents’ interpretation of past events and the OCL opinion of best interests, will be revealing. And it is what any judge in the system, fairly enough, is waiting on as well before their decision is made. Can you see that, or do you disagree? Oh - let’s speak to that OCL accusation. You are, I trust, aware that pedophiles use tools to source their victims (one of them regularly being magic tricks), so I’m not surprised your OCL worker was taken aback when your d3 came out with talk of magic tricks. I think it was a fairly standard, protective response from your OCL worker and frankly I think she should have received censure if she didn't investigate that comment further. It has not been disproven, you'll have a CAS letter confirming and the remainder of the OCL report would be a fair assessment of the home situation. Can you see that, or do you disagree?
Comment