Her and I don't get along. It's my fault as much as it is hers. Too many emotions still. In the process of litigation, as she refuses any sort of mediation. I'm suing for equal acces, shared custody. She came back with full custody for herself and week-end access for me. Time passed, and yes I became mean to her, giving her a taste of the pointless/riduculous trials she would put me through in everything from returning clean clothes to not giving our son back to me for my weeks. She got sick of putting up with my inconsistancy, and agreed to a meeting with lawyers. (Funny how it's no big deal when it's her doing it to me, but unacceptable when its returned..
Anyways... We hammered out an agreement. Minutes of Settlement to be exact. It was inconvenient for both of us at time. But I arranged people to pick the boy up at 4pm as required by the agreement (hard to do when you're working 9-5), and asked for some lee-way. She lectured me on meeting my responsablilities. Thus, another 100 bucks a month to pay someone to pick the little monster up at 4 from her place (welfare Mom - High school drop-out, no desire to do anything but collect government subsidy. Or so it seems from this side of the fence at least.)
A few more months pass - and now she levels her aim at me. She's moving out of the city. Mid-week access (as agreed to in the Minutes) is no longer acceptable. It will be my responsablitly to drive both ways when I want to get my son for my week. I have to drive an hour each way to go get him. She has no license, and thus cannot drive him to me.
She plans on making a family with her new boyfriend (with whom she is pregnant) in this new home of hers. And cannot see a SINGLE 'con' to her moving away and ending mid-week access unilaterally. Like she actually put some thought into a 'pro' and 'con' list to help her decide whether or not to shaft her son, and her san's father.
Anyway...
So what's likely to happen? My lawyer says we'll file a motion to either have the child returned to my city, or that our son be placed with me. What are the odds of this actually coming to fruition? Will she be forced to move back? Will She be forced to grant mid-week access again? Will she be forced to give him up to me full-time? Any ideas?
Anyways... We hammered out an agreement. Minutes of Settlement to be exact. It was inconvenient for both of us at time. But I arranged people to pick the boy up at 4pm as required by the agreement (hard to do when you're working 9-5), and asked for some lee-way. She lectured me on meeting my responsablilities. Thus, another 100 bucks a month to pay someone to pick the little monster up at 4 from her place (welfare Mom - High school drop-out, no desire to do anything but collect government subsidy. Or so it seems from this side of the fence at least.)
A few more months pass - and now she levels her aim at me. She's moving out of the city. Mid-week access (as agreed to in the Minutes) is no longer acceptable. It will be my responsablitly to drive both ways when I want to get my son for my week. I have to drive an hour each way to go get him. She has no license, and thus cannot drive him to me.
She plans on making a family with her new boyfriend (with whom she is pregnant) in this new home of hers. And cannot see a SINGLE 'con' to her moving away and ending mid-week access unilaterally. Like she actually put some thought into a 'pro' and 'con' list to help her decide whether or not to shaft her son, and her san's father.
Anyway...
So what's likely to happen? My lawyer says we'll file a motion to either have the child returned to my city, or that our son be placed with me. What are the odds of this actually coming to fruition? Will she be forced to move back? Will She be forced to grant mid-week access again? Will she be forced to give him up to me full-time? Any ideas?
Comment