I think you would have an extremely tough time proving undue hardship against a household where the only adult is on welfare, if you are employed and live with another adult in a financial partnership.
I think you would also have a tough time saying your common-law's child is your stepchild. Since you are not married, there's no legal obligation to her child.
These are the main rebuttals you can expect to have brought against you if you make those your main arguments.
What your ex would have a much harder time arguing against is that she is not intentionally underemployed.
Your agreement indicated she intended to find a job. You anticipated this happening before you went on EI for the summer. Full table CS instead of offset was never meant to be a permanent solution at the time of the agreement.
I think you would also have a tough time saying your common-law's child is your stepchild. Since you are not married, there's no legal obligation to her child.
These are the main rebuttals you can expect to have brought against you if you make those your main arguments.
What your ex would have a much harder time arguing against is that she is not intentionally underemployed.
Your agreement indicated she intended to find a job. You anticipated this happening before you went on EI for the summer. Full table CS instead of offset was never meant to be a permanent solution at the time of the agreement.
Comment