My dear friends,
I have a motion in play (i'm the moving party) that will be heard by submissions only. There is a timeline for these submissions.
STBX lawyer had asked for one extension. I provided it. Now she is asking for another, because of a car accident she was in.
While I am very sorry that STBX lawyer was in a car accident, she is clearly stalling and the matter is headed to trial.
This lawyer (with respect to the good ones) is a complete clown.
Do I provide another extension ? I feel that I shouldn't. In which case she would motion for it via 14B, and potentially ding me with costs.
The motion pertains to imputing her income, (and I think they know I have them by the tail).
What do I do ?
Ask always, thank you.
PND
I have a motion in play (i'm the moving party) that will be heard by submissions only. There is a timeline for these submissions.
STBX lawyer had asked for one extension. I provided it. Now she is asking for another, because of a car accident she was in.
While I am very sorry that STBX lawyer was in a car accident, she is clearly stalling and the matter is headed to trial.
This lawyer (with respect to the good ones) is a complete clown.
Do I provide another extension ? I feel that I shouldn't. In which case she would motion for it via 14B, and potentially ding me with costs.
The motion pertains to imputing her income, (and I think they know I have them by the tail).
What do I do ?
Ask always, thank you.
PND
Comment