I'm curious to get the sense of this article by Gary Direnfeld here:
50/50 Residential Arrangement May Equal Loss Of Relationship In The Long Run
I'm not sure I'm getting whether he's saying that requesting a 50/50 parenting arrangement increases parental conflict and therefore is not in the children's best interest.
I quote:
"As soon as the argument over the kids becomes about the 50/50 residential care arrangement, the writing is on the wall that at least one of the parents has lost sight of the best interest of their children.
These kind of fights tend to take on epic proportion and the next issue to be determined becomes who can baby-sit when one or other parent is unavailable because typically neither parent can be available 100% of their 50% of the time with whatever schedule is determined."
50/50 Residential Arrangement May Equal Loss Of Relationship In The Long Run
I'm not sure I'm getting whether he's saying that requesting a 50/50 parenting arrangement increases parental conflict and therefore is not in the children's best interest.
I quote:
"As soon as the argument over the kids becomes about the 50/50 residential care arrangement, the writing is on the wall that at least one of the parents has lost sight of the best interest of their children.
These kind of fights tend to take on epic proportion and the next issue to be determined becomes who can baby-sit when one or other parent is unavailable because typically neither parent can be available 100% of their 50% of the time with whatever schedule is determined."
Comment