I want to ask all here to share thier thoughts to my questions.
Do you think the government has a level of care to to it's citizens as a whole, and to an individual? Also the same for each of its agencies?
Now do you think that that level of due dilligence and or duty of care is limited to one party in an individual contract... the court writes the contract, an order. FRO administers that contract, and the parties to the contract are the recipiant and the payor. FRO by thier Act is not a party to any preceedings... then how can they be stating "on behalf of so and so recipient. Has anyone ever seen where FRO was "on behalf of the payor"
Do you think FRO/Director there fore should have the same duty of care to each party.
If they say they dont/cant then why are they so baiased to a recipiant.
To me both should be treated equally. Please share your thoughts as I will be carrying them with me and hope to use.
Do you think the government has a level of care to to it's citizens as a whole, and to an individual? Also the same for each of its agencies?
Now do you think that that level of due dilligence and or duty of care is limited to one party in an individual contract... the court writes the contract, an order. FRO administers that contract, and the parties to the contract are the recipiant and the payor. FRO by thier Act is not a party to any preceedings... then how can they be stating "on behalf of so and so recipient. Has anyone ever seen where FRO was "on behalf of the payor"
Do you think FRO/Director there fore should have the same duty of care to each party.
If they say they dont/cant then why are they so baiased to a recipiant.
To me both should be treated equally. Please share your thoughts as I will be carrying them with me and hope to use.
Comment