Hi Everyone,
This is a nice place to share and gather information, specially when I represent myself.
I am fighting SS. My son lives with me 76% of the time on temporary order and his wishes. I am re-married and to my son, I have step daughter and daughter from new marriage.
Have been divorced in 1997, but till 2003 we were in and out of cohabiting, while I was in USA with my son and she was in Canada as per her CRA filings. But she did spent a some time in USA.
In 2006 she filed for SS and it's been dragging on. I do not have stable income as I am working for Corporation owned by me 70%. She "performs special services to men for cash" as my former counsel puts it and that is really hard to prove. However she takes my son twice a year to Cuba and goes on vacation herself. As per temp. order she was imputed income of 20K, while I was imputed 84K based on Credit Application, but not on CRA assessment. CRA was 17K. I was under impression, that judges should use CRA assessment for calculation.
Next steps:
1. questioning
2. Settlement conference
3. Motion, I brought up and adjourned, she failed on court order twice.
4. Will see where 3 of above will lead us
I wonder if someone is in situation close to mine, so we could exchange ideas and experience.
This is a nice place to share and gather information, specially when I represent myself.
I am fighting SS. My son lives with me 76% of the time on temporary order and his wishes. I am re-married and to my son, I have step daughter and daughter from new marriage.
Have been divorced in 1997, but till 2003 we were in and out of cohabiting, while I was in USA with my son and she was in Canada as per her CRA filings. But she did spent a some time in USA.
In 2006 she filed for SS and it's been dragging on. I do not have stable income as I am working for Corporation owned by me 70%. She "performs special services to men for cash" as my former counsel puts it and that is really hard to prove. However she takes my son twice a year to Cuba and goes on vacation herself. As per temp. order she was imputed income of 20K, while I was imputed 84K based on Credit Application, but not on CRA assessment. CRA was 17K. I was under impression, that judges should use CRA assessment for calculation.
Next steps:
1. questioning
2. Settlement conference
3. Motion, I brought up and adjourned, she failed on court order twice.
4. Will see where 3 of above will lead us
I wonder if someone is in situation close to mine, so we could exchange ideas and experience.