I had filed a motion with regards to interim shared parenting. I got many of the things I asked for. The Applicant Mother had some one off thing in her reply that she didn't like two social media posts I had done about our daughter. The judge indicated at the case that she worries about these things because she has dealt with many sexual offenders.
Here is the problem. The judge in her order put this part in and said everything else was stayed until I complied. It was the only area at the motion however that was not discussed in any depth. So in the judges order she put ALL social media post to be taken down regarding my daughter.
She read the order which had already been written and I asked for clarification because it was so broad and she got kind of flustered because I think she realized that she had written something ill defined.. So she said the objectionable videos. And then I pushed further and she said the two in the motion. But then in the final order left it "all social media".
Well my ex was there and heard so when i said id take down the two videos she said, no ALL videos. Thus going by what was written.
There are a few logistical problems with this which weren't vetted at trail. For one I am an entertainment producer by trade. The videos that contain my daughter, which are all innocent are not solely in my control. I have both investment as well as entertainment company partners including the third largest distributor of video content in the world. Second I don't even know how to define objectionable because its all legal videos rated G. And its subjective. The way something like this should have been done is Applicant Mother file a motion and all parties who own the content have a right to representation.
Also by labeling ALL SOCAIL MEDIA that would literally mean pictures with my grandmother on fb etc.. and the mother has several pictures up.
The order was just kind of pasted on, overly broad and ill defined.
I was naive and brought a motion to have this changed. I should have appealed it but ran past 7 day period. It was a different motions judge who said it was outside of their scope to overturn it and I got dinged for costs.
The judge said I could file a B14 motion for clarification. Is this the way to go? Any other suggestions?
Here is the problem. The judge in her order put this part in and said everything else was stayed until I complied. It was the only area at the motion however that was not discussed in any depth. So in the judges order she put ALL social media post to be taken down regarding my daughter.
She read the order which had already been written and I asked for clarification because it was so broad and she got kind of flustered because I think she realized that she had written something ill defined.. So she said the objectionable videos. And then I pushed further and she said the two in the motion. But then in the final order left it "all social media".
Well my ex was there and heard so when i said id take down the two videos she said, no ALL videos. Thus going by what was written.
There are a few logistical problems with this which weren't vetted at trail. For one I am an entertainment producer by trade. The videos that contain my daughter, which are all innocent are not solely in my control. I have both investment as well as entertainment company partners including the third largest distributor of video content in the world. Second I don't even know how to define objectionable because its all legal videos rated G. And its subjective. The way something like this should have been done is Applicant Mother file a motion and all parties who own the content have a right to representation.
Also by labeling ALL SOCAIL MEDIA that would literally mean pictures with my grandmother on fb etc.. and the mother has several pictures up.
The order was just kind of pasted on, overly broad and ill defined.
I was naive and brought a motion to have this changed. I should have appealed it but ran past 7 day period. It was a different motions judge who said it was outside of their scope to overturn it and I got dinged for costs.
The judge said I could file a B14 motion for clarification. Is this the way to go? Any other suggestions?
Comment