Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shared Custody

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shared Custody

    I have been representing myself while my ex has a lawyer. Attended the case conference and we settled on an equalization payment amount that I have to pay. The amount ended up about half way between what I thought I should pay and what they thought I should pay. Judge chalked that up as a success. Still outstanding is the child support amount I have to pay. We are a small amount apart on that numbers (for them), but for me it hits me actually about 4 times as much. We are essentially shared custody with me having over the 40% custody amount (which they are not agreeing on...yet!). If CRA will not recognize my custody time I lose tax benefits and deductions to the tune of about $300/mth. I have temporarily agreed to pay support for now that is about 1/3 higher than the straight set-off method used in shared custody. Next court date is still over three months away for a Trial Management Conference.

    1) Should I put in a motion now for a court sanctioned child custody regiment that affirms my custody time? I am self-employed working from home, the home the children were born in and where they go to school. I have more time than money to give to these kids.

    P.S. I've been purposely vague on the numbers in case someone is "breathing over my shoulder".

  • #2
    Have you journalled your time with the child? Chances are you are going to have to prove that the current arrangement is status quo. If not, it won't be easy, as it will be her word vs yours (if she hasn't consented to the schedule).

    Comment


    • #3
      Journal not required because she does not contest the current schedule. However, the current over-night schedule we have is to her benefit to fit her work schedule, which starts very early in the morning. The problem is that I have somehow allowed a drop-off at my house between 8 and 9 PM the night before, which turns me basically into a "hotel" for these kids. I asked to change that to 5 or 6 PM, so I can at least have dinner with the kids and more time with them, but since lawyer is now involved you can imagine that that did not go over well.

      I want to have my kids more time and they would like to as well. I have a great relationship with them. I just don't know if my chances are as good as I think getting a court order for more custody time. I'd be interested to hear how many men out there have made this argument and got a court to agree?

      Comment


      • #4
        My husband has joint custody of his kids, but is filing a variation to increase his access time. If successful, it will amount to a 60-40 split, but we aren't filing to change the custody to "shared".

        Maybe someone can clarify, but our lawyer advised us not to push the "shared" custody option, just be concerned about the access time?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by CCB View Post
          My husband has joint custody of his kids, but is filing a variation to increase his access time. If successful, it will amount to a 60-40 split, but we aren't filing to change the custody to "shared".

          Maybe someone can clarify, but our lawyer advised us not to push the "shared" custody option, just be concerned about the access time?
          You should probably start your own topic so as not to hijack OP's thread.

          But from my perspective, the lawyers advice is fairly sound. It is more important to establish status quo. It will be easier to establish status quo if the ex is less likely to fight it. Once "share" gets thrown into the equation, the ex is likely to see $$ and this action as an attack on what she receives in c/s. Therefore will likely fight tooth and nail.

          If you get her to agree to 60/40 and 6-8 months down the road file a motion to change c/s in accordance with the share parenting schedule, it is significantly more likely to succeed. Status quo of shared has been established, the kids will hopefully be thriving and the ex won't have a lot of ground to stand on because, while the parenting terminology hasn't changed on paper....it has in reality.

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks HammerDad for the advice. Sorry, wasn't intending on seeking my own advice, I was just confused about whether miragesailor really needed the official "shared custody", or if he could just go for joint and then have 40% access.

            Comment


            • #7
              I've been told the same thing. If the courts "sniff out" an agenda to change custody just to lower C/S then they will be reluctant to be swayed in your favour.

              However, at this point there is no C/S order in place with my case. I have never given any indication (in fact the opposite) that I have ever recognized anything but us being equal custody parents. I would think at this point, any fight against me on this will smell of C/S concerns on her part as well.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by CCB View Post
                Thanks HammerDad for the advice. Sorry, wasn't intending on seeking my own advice, I was just confused about whether miragesailor really needed the official "shared custody", or if he could just go for joint and then have 40% access.
                Joint has already been established over the past two years while settlement has been in the works. The 40% access is the contention because they have me short by 4 hrs/week.

                Comment


                • #9
                  If there is no C/S agreement in place, then insist on getting what you want and what best represents the circumstances in writing with the courts. Like the others point out, what's in the order is what the judges assume is status quo, and it's difficult to prove otherwise.

                  My husband signed a joint custody agreement with his ex-wife (before he met me) who was very reasonable at the time. Then he met me lol and it all changed...my point, don't trust the ex lol!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by miragesailor View Post
                    Joint has already been established over the past two years while settlement has been in the works. The 40% access is the contention because they have me short by 4 hrs/week.
                    Shared is generally determined by overnights, not hours in the week. If you have 3 out of 7 nights, you would meet the threshold for shared in most instances.

                    Should they argue that you don't feed them, that your house is just a place to sleep, you argue that you are capable of feeding them and ensuring they are provided for and that providing the necessary accomodations for each child to sleep is a large portion of the costs associated with the kids.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I have never heard of this "overnight" threshold in all the reading I have done on the subject. Is that just a common sense assumption I should make or do you have personal experience with that applictions of the law?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I've heard conflicting arguments about this as well. Some judges count overnights, some count mornings, etc. What I can't see them counting is actual hours...4 hours short seems a bit picky to me, like they are just trying to keep you short of that official 40%.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Overnights are generally what the courts will look at first. The person who puts them to bed and gets them up in the morning to school bears a lot of responsibility, both economically and family wise.

                          For them to say, you are short 4 hours per week and your house is merely a place to bed down is unreasonable. The kids should not be coming over that late.

                          I would argue you have shared custoday at the moment as the child stays at your house X days a week. If they counted hours, are they really counting the hours the kid is in school and the teachers are looking look after the kids as time they spend with the kids? Counting hours doesn't work primarily because of school and trying to allocate that as part of one parents time.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            They are actually (her lawyer that is) counting, "waking hours", "sleeping hours" and "school hours". Here's the kicker...they have her down as having 2.55 times more waking hours with the kids than I do...unless I want to keep them up until midnight I guess. Personally I wouldn't want to admit that I am ripping-off my husband to that extent on quality time with his kids, but that's what their going with! They are all school nights I have them to boot, so I can't even have a fun movie night with them unless I ask for a Friday or Saturday night, which she's never had a problem with. She's never had a problem with me taking the kids on long weekend trips with my current partner either, so to stand up now and make this kind of declaration smacks of a power play for demanding higher child support than the fair set-off method. "Let's act like shared custody, but don't agree or admit that is what it is"!!

                            Any holes in my argument that you can see?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The lawyer is trying to muddy the waters and confuse you.

                              I mean, god forbid the kid sleeps in one day or stays home from school at your place (or her place) as it would totally screw up the ratios. Which is generally why trying to work it out in hours is so unreasonable.

                              Your argument sounds ok, but I think you are focusing on the wrong "hot topic". I wouldn't make c/s an argument that I would focus on. I would argue that each parent has shared in the responsibility to raise the children and they each have accomodations at each parents house. You share the responsibility should the child get sick and need to come home. The child sleeps at your residence 3 (or 4) out of 7 days.

                              Also, here is where you journal would have come in handy. It would throw a huge monkey wrench into their parenting time schedule. Unless she is using a journal which shows you had X days last year from Xam/pm to Yam/pm, they are speaking in relative terms and speculation.

                              If you had a journal that provided that you had 1 extra day every 2-3 months, their average of time gets put out the window. Plus, what about summer, March Break and Christmas Break? Have they contemplated those? A journal may have helped kill their hours argument.

                              Also, who has more sleeping hours? And who is going to determine which type of hours, sleeping vs waking are more important?

                              IMO going by hours is unreasonable Parent A could be the one who gets the kids out of bed (at their house obviously) and fed and off to school each day, but have less waking hours with the kids then Parent B because Parent B picks them up from school feeds them dinner and drops them off at 8pm. So if the kids go to bed at 10pm, the Parent A gets like 3-3.5 hours but parent B gets 4-4.5 hours.....but Parent B doesn't incur the extra expenses of requiring sleeping accomodations.

                              For the ex and their lawyer to split hairs over 4 hours, a judge is likely to see right through it.

                              Comment

                              Our Divorce Forums
                              Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
                              Working...
                              X