So - Ex has an MBA in International Finance (but no designation CPA etc). She is currently teaching finance subjects between 10-12hrs a week (depending on enrollment) at a local college. Makes about 55K/yr.
If there is an opportunity for her to work full time (36-40hrs/week) and make between 55-65K, would the courts urge that? Or would they feel that since she is making essentially that much now - there is no onus on her to get full time for the same pay?
My concern is that if enrollment drops and she can only work say 8-10 hrs a week then that of course reduces her annual income. Our SS review is set for next year. If I can identify areas/jobs that she could have taken yet felt they were essentially the same pay and just more hours - will the courts view this as a good thing or bad?
If there is an opportunity for her to work full time (36-40hrs/week) and make between 55-65K, would the courts urge that? Or would they feel that since she is making essentially that much now - there is no onus on her to get full time for the same pay?
My concern is that if enrollment drops and she can only work say 8-10 hrs a week then that of course reduces her annual income. Our SS review is set for next year. If I can identify areas/jobs that she could have taken yet felt they were essentially the same pay and just more hours - will the courts view this as a good thing or bad?
Comment