I have a sc coming up and wanted to hear some advice from the parents. I have been at sc before many times and always came out with additional access.
After my recent sc, the court ordered a hearing on the issue of material change. I'm also seeking to change custody. I was again given more access. The hearing never happened. I brought a disclosure motion and it pushed everything back as it took me several months to win the motion. I also won a christmas access motion after that. The hearing hasn't happened, my old lawyer came off the record and i got a new lawyer.
The disclosure still hasnt come in and the court wanted to discuss the next steps and The new lawyers set the matter back for another sc. I'm going to be amending my pleadings and possible asking for ocl or section 30. This was already mentioned to the case management judge previously but the judge wanted me to prove a material change first. I never brought a motion for it.
What is everyones thought on amending a pleading before a sc? I know the rules allow me to do so on motion if the other party doesn't agree. Im basically going to be seeking full out shared custody. Either week about or 223 225 schedule.
What sort of things could argue to justify shared, apart from all of the great information lf32 has posted in the debate? Such is it would be in child's best interest to enjoy weekly activities with dad, less gap between visits, etc. I know I need to give this more thought.
As per sc, what sound advice Do you guys have?would you agree to an interim order that's not completely in your favour but gives you more time? What i mean is that it gives you more time on the other parents terms. Not yours. Would you agree to an interim order that gives you more time than you have now but far less than what you are asking for? What about a little more time than what you have now but screws you over in daycare costs? Would you agree to unreasomble daycare position just tonget more time? Reason I ask is because I have seen many cases where the interim order ends up being the final order and i really don't want to settle unless there is a fair compromise
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
After my recent sc, the court ordered a hearing on the issue of material change. I'm also seeking to change custody. I was again given more access. The hearing never happened. I brought a disclosure motion and it pushed everything back as it took me several months to win the motion. I also won a christmas access motion after that. The hearing hasn't happened, my old lawyer came off the record and i got a new lawyer.
The disclosure still hasnt come in and the court wanted to discuss the next steps and The new lawyers set the matter back for another sc. I'm going to be amending my pleadings and possible asking for ocl or section 30. This was already mentioned to the case management judge previously but the judge wanted me to prove a material change first. I never brought a motion for it.
What is everyones thought on amending a pleading before a sc? I know the rules allow me to do so on motion if the other party doesn't agree. Im basically going to be seeking full out shared custody. Either week about or 223 225 schedule.
What sort of things could argue to justify shared, apart from all of the great information lf32 has posted in the debate? Such is it would be in child's best interest to enjoy weekly activities with dad, less gap between visits, etc. I know I need to give this more thought.
As per sc, what sound advice Do you guys have?would you agree to an interim order that's not completely in your favour but gives you more time? What i mean is that it gives you more time on the other parents terms. Not yours. Would you agree to an interim order that gives you more time than you have now but far less than what you are asking for? What about a little more time than what you have now but screws you over in daycare costs? Would you agree to unreasomble daycare position just tonget more time? Reason I ask is because I have seen many cases where the interim order ends up being the final order and i really don't want to settle unless there is a fair compromise
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Comment