Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wow: More "Status Quo" goodness from Justice Pazaratz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wow: More "Status Quo" goodness from Justice Pazaratz

    Cochrane v. Myers, Campeau, McSherry, 2014 ONSC 2048 (CanLII)
    Date: 2014-04-02 (Docket: F1612/10)
    Citation: Cochrane v. Myers, Campeau, McSherry, 2014 ONSC 2048 (CanLII)
    CanLII - 2014 ONSC 2048 (CanLII)

    1. In a custody trial the “status quo” can become a double-edged sword:
    a. The person who already has the child starts with an obvious advantage.
    b. But if the existing arrangement hasn’t gone so well, it may provide a wake-up call for what we don’t want to perpetuate.
    As usual, Justice Pazaratz impresses.

    Just noticed the "white knight" was representing grandma on this one...

    Interesting direction I have not seen to the CAS before:

    361. Court staff are directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the Children’s Aid Society of Hamilton for inclusion in their files relating to:
    a. Historical contact by Natasha Myers and Michael Dowling to the child Parrish, who is the subject of this proceeding.
    b. Historical and unknown future contact by Natasha Myers and Michael Dowling to the 10 year old twins Alexis and Billie (who are not the subject of this proceeding).
    c. The scheduled birth of Natasha Myers’ baby on August 4, 2014.
    Last edited by Tayken; 05-23-2014, 03:37 PM.

  • #2
    Wow, just wow.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by FB_ View Post
      Wow, just wow.
      And, I thought I had problems LOL.

      Gotta love the modern family.

      Comment


      • #4
        Damn.

        Hello Jerry Springer

        Comment


        • #5
          I got to the point where the mom feels the need to clarify that she is a "satanicist" and not a "satanist", and gave up in despair.

          Comment


          • #6
            The theme song of 'Deliverance" was going through my head when I was reading this case.

            The whole family is involved so it's no wonder it's a mess.

            Wonder if the father and mother will ever figure that you leave the crazy relatives out of things.

            totally nutty.

            Comment


            • #7
              This really just reinforces my opinion that having children isn't a right, it's a privilege, and there should be some sort of licensing process before it's granted.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by stripes View Post
                I got to the point where the mom feels the need to clarify that she is a "satanicist" and not a "satanist", and gave up in despair.
                "A curious – and seemingly pointless – issue arose concerning religion."

                Which made laugh when he wrote that.

                Comment

                Our Divorce Forums
                Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
                Working...
                X