Originally posted by Soiled
View Post
Did you read the articles?? They specifically talk about kids faring better in parenting arrangements that "involve" both parents. One of the articles even suggests 35% is enough time to allow kids to foster a meaningful relationship with a parent. They go on to state that as long as there is joint custody and substantial enough time with both parents, kids will be better off than their counterparts with little or no access to one parent. Not one of those articles says it must be equal for optimum well-being of the kids. Correct me if I am wrong but that's not what I read in the above posted articles. In fact, for such a "50/50 denier" such as myself (some people on here would say), the articles made me feel pretty good. My ex sees the kids under 40% but according to these studies, my kids are going to turn out just fine after all. [emoji6]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment