Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reverse "double dipping"?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Reverse "double dipping"?

    Hello,

    I've read through the posts on double dipping where a spouse receives their 50% share of pension through equalization and then try to claim spousal support on the other spouse's remaining pension income.

    My situation is similar but somewhat different and I am hoping someone may have some answers for me

    My STBX has been receiving his pension since the age of 51. Since our separation over 3 years ago, he also refuses to work to his earning capacity to help support our three dependent children. He had an income imputed to him in court last year. He is now 55 and I am 50. He is now claiming spousal support based on the increased income I will receive from his pension plan and his corresponding decrease in pension income when the divorce is finalized. My pension will also be split with him but his share of my pension will have to remain in a locked-in vehicle while my share of his pension will be in the form of a monthly pension cheque.

    I have 2 questions:

    1. Is this still considered "double-dipping"?

    2. If his income has previously been imputed, what are the chances he will succeed with a spousal support claim? He always earned more than I did throughout our 25 year marriage.


    Thank you!

  • #2
    He is now claiming spousal support
    What is his entitlement?

    Did he suffer financial loss from the marriage, for which you should compensate him?

    Is he suffering hardship?

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi OrleansLawyer,

      He didn't suffer financial loss from the marriage. He always earned more than I did. I think he may claim he is suffering financial loss because he will have to share his pension income with me (but he will receive half my pension too, but it is valued lower than his).

      He is not suffering financial hardship. He lives with his girlfriend and does not work. His income this year will be a little lower than mine ($52,000 versus my $66,000). A judge ruled he was intentionally under-employed and imputed an income to him. He currently pays nothing for the kids. His pension income will decrease by $15,000 when the family patrimony is split.

      Thanks

      Comment


      • #4
        To clarify, he was imputed an income for child support purposes but that order was temporary and is not in place at the moment, pending the final trial.

        Comment

        Our Divorce Forums
        Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
        Working...
        X