My stbx has been kind enough to give me a small concession in our Sep Agreement with respect to CS.
As I understand it, when we later file for official "divorce" the judge reviews CS arrangment as an advocate for the child. If its the normal "tables" then fine but a variation in CS "could" result in judge denying divorce.
Without getting into intricate details, my ex will be getting a generous amount of CS albeit not the "full" amount plus we have 50/50 custody. The idea is that I will have an incentive to work harder to get extra income and at the end of the day its to everyone's best interest that my income continues to come in.
Given that my ex and I agree, how likely is it the judge will refuse the divorce ? Do judges tend to be "full tables or else ?" OR will they use "common sense". I don't mean to sound sarcastic, but from what I've read and heard about in Family Law, common sense and Family law tend to be mutually exclusive lol.
As I understand it, when we later file for official "divorce" the judge reviews CS arrangment as an advocate for the child. If its the normal "tables" then fine but a variation in CS "could" result in judge denying divorce.
Without getting into intricate details, my ex will be getting a generous amount of CS albeit not the "full" amount plus we have 50/50 custody. The idea is that I will have an incentive to work harder to get extra income and at the end of the day its to everyone's best interest that my income continues to come in.
Given that my ex and I agree, how likely is it the judge will refuse the divorce ? Do judges tend to be "full tables or else ?" OR will they use "common sense". I don't mean to sound sarcastic, but from what I've read and heard about in Family Law, common sense and Family law tend to be mutually exclusive lol.
Comment