User CP
New posts
Advertising
|
||||||
| Political Issues This forum is for discussing the political aspects of divorce: reform to divorce laws, men's rights, women's rights, injustices in the divorce system, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
Child support is paid on payor's income - it is as simple as that. Tables are generally fair if you ask me.
s.7 is discretionary (sort of) - if Dad and Mom can't afford extra activities then only basics are eligible ---as in "reasonable " expenses. Maybe your husband is paying too much s.7? Why are you on about the ex's income? It is relevant to s.7 only, right? She is working 2 jobs ...what else do you expect? If her income is suspect, compare her bank account expenditures to her stated income and make your point to the judge. Notice to Disclose and all that. You are fighting about parenting. You should try not to fight about parenting...just share it. Or joint custody with liberal access. If she is vindictive, try getting a children's lawyer for the kids (depending on ages). Kids know the score and usually (not always depending on brainwashing) will opt to be with both parents. The family law system in Canada is too sensitve to allegations of abuse of the children which are prone to misuse by one party (usually mom). It has to be admitted that women use this for collateral advantage. Sad but true. You don't mention spousal support - if not, he caught a break there. You could probably have got an Order for some of those things you said were "denied". |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I admire your passion. Keep up the good fight. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thank you Lost Father! Clearly someone that gets it. For those of you that are still walking around in a haze of "things aren't so bad" "it generally works" "it could be better, but hey, what can I do about it?" I have one thing to say... WAKE THE BLEEP UP! Do not keep kidding yourselves that the machine that is family law is not purposefully set up as a means to rob families from financial security thus dis-empowering the little guy yet again. It is another means of producing a debt culture which keeps you indebted to a system that allows the rich to get richer and the middle class to become poor. It is not about justice, the best interest of the children, or any other delusions you make convince yourselves of is not so bad. It it was it would not be a case management system that would be drawn out over years and years at a costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars. If it really was about the best interest of the children it would be handled swiftly through arbitration wherein final decisions would be summed up within 6 months. Not millions of letters courting each other, case conferences, settlement conferences, trials, and maybe in 5 years time there is some more motions floating about. All the while, coating the pockets of high priced lawyers and judges. Duh! They don't want it to go faster nor do they want resolution. They want families destroyed so they can maintain power over you. Who are they? The policy makers, the big business, the bankers that loan you your funds for your lawyers, the judges that sit back and laugh while sipping champagne at their Moskoka cottage. If you are distracted fighting with your ex - guess what you aren't paying attention to all the other Laws they put into place to strip you of your rights and freedoms in every other area of your life. Keith Olbermann Reads The Statement Released By The Wall Street Protesters - 2011-10-05 - YouTube |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I pretty much agree with the above. Once your parenting time is 50/50, the tables work. Your house is basically fighting about parenting, and although you say that the husband was/ is the knight, there are two sides to every story. |
|
|||
|
Can someone help with some technical advise?
When I reply to a thread, how do I include quotes from previous comments from that thread? Is it a cut and paste option? I cannot figure it out! Thanks |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uttering threats allegations and its impact on Family Court. | wretchedotis | Divorce & Family Law | 29 | 08-17-2011 05:27 PM |
| Defining Contempt of Court | Epona | Divorce & Family Law | 8 | 11-25-2010 11:38 PM |
| Motion to Vary - Applicant's affidavit | dickstacie | Divorce & Family Law | 4 | 02-17-2010 03:26 PM |
| Family Law Court Transcripts | tycooke | Divorce & Family Law | 4 | 12-03-2006 08:03 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 PM.





