Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Political Issues

Political Issues This forum is for discussing the political aspects of divorce: reform to divorce laws, men's rights, women's rights, injustices in the divorce system, etc.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2006, 11:22 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Springheeled Jack is on a distinguished road
Default Thank Sean

I have been offering to sit down with her to sort things out via text messages, which are vastly becoming a pointless waste because she never answers them.
I have apoligised over and over again for my part of the argument. No apology came from her. She even blasted my aunt over the phone, making my aunt cry.

I hve offered solutions to her. To no avail, Ive logged what I said and when I said it.

Ive offered to talk, Ive offered solutions but she doesnt want to know.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2006, 01:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 205
sasha1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Actually, I think taping conversations is sometimes a good thing. In your case, I think your concern about having the threat on tape is very justified, but keep in mind, these judges didn't just fall off the turnip truck, either. If the conversation is admissable in the UK, the whole thing will be entered; not just the sections she wants, and the judge will realize you were goaded into the argument to begin with. Her attitude and character will show through quite nicely as well.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2006, 11:34 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,943
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Uttering threats is serious in Canada

Criminal Code

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/index.html


264.1 (1) Uttering Threats — Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. (2) Punishment — Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months. (3) Idem — Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b) or (c) (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. R.S. 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 38; 1994, c. 44, s. 16.

In regards to the taped conversation, I think if it is used, most likely the Judge will also her the antagonizing provoking tone of the other party who was aware and had prior knowledge of the conversation being recorded.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.