Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Political Issues

Political Issues This forum is for discussing the political aspects of divorce: reform to divorce laws, men's rights, women's rights, injustices in the divorce system, etc.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2010, 09:38 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,943
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default "Lawyer guilty of perjury"

cp from Canada Court Watch

..WINDSOR STAR

"Lawyer guilty of perjury"

Judge rejects Maroon's explanation of documents

By Don Lajoie Star Staff Reporter, Wednesday, December 03, 2003

A Superior Court judge has found Windsor lawyer Wendi Maroon guilty of perjury for signing and filing a false affidavit in a divorce case.

Justice Johanne Morrissette found Maroon guilty Tuesday on two charges stemming from a falsely-sworn affidavit filed in November 1999 and a subsequent attempt to cover up the crime. She said the defence Maroon gave at her trial could not be believed.

"The Crown has proven the accused guilty on both counts," stated Morrissette. "It's a sad day for the legal profession to see a lawyer, who wanted to do good, become caught up in a web of coverup and fail to adhere to the fundamental code of conduct."

Morrissette told the court her decision was largely based upon "compelling evidence" contained in telephone records which convinced her that Maroon's version of events was not credible.

The defence suggested the lawyer's client, faced with a deadline to have divorce documents seeking greater access to her children signed before a lawyer, had driven from Kingston, Ont. to Windsor Nov. 17, 1999, arriving at 1:30 p.m. to sign the affidavit in Maroon's office.

But phone records showed that the client, Sharon Bonnici, placed a long-distance call from Kingston to her ex-husband in Windsor at about 7 p.m. that same evening. Morrissette said she believed it would have been "impossible" for Bonnici to make such a return trip ? a six- to seven-hour drive each way ? and be back in time to place the long-distance call.

Morrissette said she believed the Crown's contention that the document was simply signed without a legal witness and returned through the mail to Maroon's office.

When the lawyer representing Bonnici's ex-husband challenged the validity of the affidavit, Maroon had a second affidavit drawn up in which her client swore she had been in Windsor on the day in question.

But, after a falling-out between Maroon and her client, Bonnici claimed the lawyer coerced her into going along with the falsehoods.

She agreed because she was afraid she would lose access to her children. Bonnici said.

Morrissette said, despite some questionable testimony by Crown witnesses, she had no reasonable doubts about Maroon's guilt. A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 9.

Maroon's defence lawyer, Andrew Bradie0, declined comment until after the sentencing.

Maroon stood quietly, looking straight ahead, as the verdict was announced. After adjournment she hugged her lawyer and left the courtroom.

© Copyright 2003 Windsor Star

Copyright © 2003 CanWest Interactive Inc....

WINDSOR STAR
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2010, 11:46 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,943
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Notwithstanding the criminal ramification - Here's what happened on the professional side...

6 months suspension and $1,500.00 fine...

CanLII - 2005 ONLSHP 21 (CanLII)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2010, 05:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 162
Desperate_Dad is on a distinguished road
Default Am I surprised?

No I am not surprised. Anybody who has read any of my posts knows exactly what I think of Family Court Lawyers. It is taking all of my energy to refrain from saying anything further.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge guilty of DUI allowed to stay on bench logicalvelocity Political Issues 0 10-31-2007 08:26 PM
Feel sad and guilty bman Divorce Support 3 03-17-2006 02:54 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 PM.