Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Political Issues

Political Issues This forum is for discussing the political aspects of divorce: reform to divorce laws, men's rights, women's rights, injustices in the divorce system, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 12:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 242
Stillbreathing is on a distinguished road
Default Criminal vs family court trial time lines

Does anyone else think it's unfair that criminals are supposed to have their trials conducted within 30 months or it violates their human right to a fair and timely trial yet family court litigants have no such rights? What are we? Second class citizens, viewed with utter disdain by the court system? My STBX and I are now in our 6th year of litigation! ...and the best part is...wait for it...we're on the fast track! What's the slow track? 40 years?

Anyone else think the timelines to trial in family court violates our right to justice?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 01:02 AM
arabian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 9,930
arabian will become famous soon enough
Default

family court issues evolve and change over time. I think that is the difference.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 09:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 242
Stillbreathing is on a distinguished road
Default

Family court matters evolve on an extremely negative continuum when issues are left unresolved for this many years. That's how things spiral out of control and often with tragic consequences. That's also why the death review committee ( who looked at actual cases of domestic homicide), recommended that high conflict cases be fast tracked through the court system. They didn't mean six, seven, eight years!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 02:16 PM
Janus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,326
Janus will become famous soon enough
Default

In criminal cases, if the trial is not completed within the given time frame, the case is dismissed.

That kind of remedy would be tricky to pull off in family law.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 02:28 PM
Tayken's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,563
Tayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janus View Post
In criminal cases, if the trial is not completed within the given time frame, the case is dismissed.

That kind of remedy would be tricky to pull off in family law.
Not just family law but, civil law in general. But, they do have a system (in some jurisdictions) to move custody and access issues faster through the system.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 02:29 PM
Tayken's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,563
Tayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillbreathing View Post
Does anyone else think it's unfair that criminals are supposed to have their trials conducted within 30 months or it violates their human right to a fair and timely trial yet family court litigants have no such rights? What are we? Second class citizens, viewed with utter disdain by the court system? My STBX and I are now in our 6th year of litigation! ...and the best part is...wait for it...we're on the fast track! What's the slow track? 40 years?

Anyone else think the timelines to trial in family court violates our right to justice?
The issues are not seen as important to the court. Conference justices would move to trial list if there was a genuine issue for trial. If you are fighting over nickels and dimes they are hoping you will both come to your senses and settle.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 03:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 242
Stillbreathing is on a distinguished road
Default

Actually the bizarre thing is several judges and my lawyer said we were high priority because there are children involved and not a single issue on anything has been resolved. The last judge has wanted us on the trial list 3 trial sittings ago. One of earliest motion judges had wanted us on the trial list 4 years ago! The other side keeps pulling stunt after stunt to delay trial. The judges get mad and huffy but allow the delays. We are on the spring trial list but I have just received word the other side wants to delay...again! I want it over and done with and move on with my life.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 09:50 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,681
trinton has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

I think CAS proceedings should be dealt with the same way as criminal matters. Unless a trial is heard by a certain time, you get your children back. ANd unless they can prove their allegations beyond reasonable doubt, you get your kids back, as well as other options such as diversion, etc but for family matters (such as parenting courses or counselling).


Sometimes family cases need years to get to the bottom of things and establish patterns of alienation ,etc. Othertimes, the prolonged proceedings berry you in financial hells and build a status quo for one parent.


I hope you are aware that there is currently a family law crisis in Canada. The system is brutal and nobody is doing anything about it. It is a multi billion dollar industry. It's a big money scandal. The longer it takes, and the more children and families suffer, the more money lawyers, mediators, therapists, doctors, etc. make. Lawyers love dragging things out to maximize their profit.

When I wanted to be a lawyer when I was younger, I only wanted to be a lawyer to become rich. Money was my primary motivation in wanting to become a lawyer.

I know I went on a bit of a tangent there but our family courts are essentially crap. A family law case should be dealt with within 6 months. Not within a decade.

This is what going to the family courts is like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwNpdAtaSV0

Last edited by trinton; 03-22-2017 at 10:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2017, 10:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 242
Stillbreathing is on a distinguished road
Default

Hahaha...that video is sooo family court! Should be shown to every litigant thinking about going through the courts!

What you said about CAS is so true... and they do actually have time lines ( which are rarely adhered to). For example , a child apprehended at birth is supposed to have had their trial by 18 months so if they are going to be made a crown ward they have the best chance for adoption. Statistically speaking 85% of adoptions are children under the age of 3. After that they have only a slim chance of being adopted.

Also CAS children at age 7 get to decide whether or not they are going to agree to be adopted by a particular family if the opportunity arises. Yet children in non- CAS family court litigation are forced to see a parent who has been criminally convicted of abusing/ assaulting them because it's in their best interest.
Go figure.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2017, 12:54 AM
Tayken's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,563
Tayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trinton View Post
I think CAS proceedings should be dealt with the same way as criminal matters. Unless a trial is heard by a certain time, you get your children back.
This is how they work. When the CAS removes a child from parents they have a very short window where they have to bring the matter to court.

Quote:
If they take a child away, the first day in court must be within 5 days from the day they took the child.
Will I need to go to court? | CLEO (Community Legal Education Ontario / ╔ducation juridique communautaire Ontario)

For more detail see:

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c11#BK59
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trial outcome re: custody/parenting - parental alienation court identified kidsRworthit Divorce & Family Law 9 07-03-2016 11:23 PM
A First For Family Court!! Desperate_Dad Financial Issues 8 10-01-2015 07:53 PM
Trial Date set by ex-Supreme Court, what to do next Roni Divorce & Family Law 1 06-13-2011 06:32 PM
Superior Court vs Family Court lee1869 Political Issues 6 03-11-2010 03:08 AM
Discouraged by family court system #1StepMom Divorce & Family Law 9 12-02-2008 10:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 AM.