User CP
New posts
Advertising
|
||||||
| General Chat This forum is for discussing anything that doesn't fit into another forum, or for discussing things that are off topic, or just for general venting. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
Well, none. I don't believe SS should be used to equalise earnings between 2 people who have different earning potentials, and where neither spouse sacrificed earning potential during marriage (or augmented earning potential at the expense of the other). SS should only be equalising an earnings or asset advantage/disadvantage that occurred **as a result of the marriage**. SS should not consider care of children after split-up - that is what CS is for. Any other expectation is a holdover from the 'women need looking after' belief.
|
|
|||
|
I agree with Dinkyface. Adults should be adults and look after themselves. Both parents should support the kids based on income.
Do we need to fill out an income earning potential form prior to marriage? Given current legislation this might be a good idea. |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Spousal Support - Why It Matters | Divorcemanagement | Political Issues | 55 | 11-03-2011 09:10 PM |
| Spousal Support...good or bad.. | jlalex | General Chat | 32 | 07-22-2010 06:33 PM |
| child support while child is in university | verytiredmother | Divorce & Family Law | 28 | 09-16-2009 10:26 PM |
| Spousal Support ruling | OB1 | Divorce & Family Law | 2 | 07-18-2008 06:48 PM |
| Paying spousal support on $40 000 per year | sammysdad | Financial Issues | 4 | 03-12-2007 11:04 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.




