Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Financial Issues

Financial Issues This forum is for discussing any of the financial issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2010, 01:45 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
OliveT is on a distinguished road
Default reduction of arrears

My partner has a fairly large outstanding amount of arrears to be paid. The amount was calculated for two years based on a certain annual income. He was representing himself (could not afford a lawyer) and she had a lawyer. Her lawyer presented him with an amount for the arrears based on a certain annual income (what he was making at the time of the court proceedings). However he found out recently that he should not have been paying any support while on ei, which he was on for a number of months of those two years after being laid off.
The arrears were supposed to have been settled a year ago based on her buying him out of the house they co-own, however at the time she could not get a mortgage for the house and so my partner did not press the issue as he did not want the children to lose their home. This is kind of a separate issue but applies as it is the reason he was not paying off the arrears. In retrospect he should have just been paying them and worked out the balance with the house later.
My question is: do you think he has a chance of retroactively reducing some of the arrears? He is now making payments towards the arrears anyway but the original amount set out did not reflect his income. Her lawyer did not ask anything about his employment history and he never knew that he did not have to pay support while on ei. My partner’s ex knew he was laid off during that period and so her lawyer should have known this as well and I believe he misrepresented the situation to my partner.
Should her lawyer also have ensured that my partner obtained independent legal advice before agreeing to the amount? Could this also be grounds for challenge? In essence this was a financial transaction.
We are not seeking an unfair adjustment or to wipe out all arrears or to pay less than we should, we are just attempting to make the situation a little more fair.

From what I have read so far, it seems pretty hit and miss whether a reduction is awarded. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
arrears, child support


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Court Interest - Post-judgement and Separation Agreement. Taxes on arrears Blueeyes Divorce & Family Law 3 05-22-2010 07:39 PM
Can a Temp Order for Reduction of CS Be Revoked? #1StepMom Financial Issues 5 06-23-2009 10:32 PM
Support Arrears littleman Financial Issues 1 06-01-2009 10:18 PM
child support arrears Sara08 Financial Issues 5 11-06-2008 06:43 AM
Arrears and 'Severability & Costs' inlimbo Financial Issues 1 11-28-2006 06:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.