Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Financial Issues

Financial Issues This forum is for discussing any of the financial issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2016, 11:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 160
zanman is on a distinguished road
Default help and thoughts

HI Everyone can this actually happen when nothing has even been signed yet ? My Friends ex's lawyer has this in the agreement , he has not signed the agreement yet but has been working back and forth with her Lawyer. I tol;d him to request it to be removed ?

In full satisfaction of his spousal support obligation, Person will pay person $52,000.00

when this Agreement is signed. If Steven does not make this payment by January 1,

2017, he will pay interest to Person on the full amount owing in the amount of 5% per

annum, compounded monthly.



your thoughts and have like a 60 day or 90 day to pay if he agrees
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2016, 11:57 AM
Rioe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,210
Rioe will become famous soon enough
Default

If he's in agreement with paying that amount, presumably they could just modify the date if the signing is delayed. Or make it a rolling date of 60 days after the signing of the agreement, as you suggest.

Until he signs the agreement, it's not a real deadline and nothing bad can happen to him on January 1. If he signs it as it's written on December 31, he could have problems though.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2016, 12:01 PM
Janus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,293
Janus will become famous soon enough
Default

Why would it not be legal? It is lump sum spousal support.

If it is the date that is the problem then just get the date changed. 60 or 90 days seems fine.

Also note that 5% per annum on $52,000 is about $220 a month, which is less than an hour's worth of lawyer time. Some things are not worth fighting over.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2016, 12:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 160
zanman is on a distinguished road
Default

Ya that was my thought also , its just he might need to sell his house to pay her out but it can't happen in 40days , He is going to send back at 60 days after signing she will get paid
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2016, 01:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,470
dinkyface will become famous soon enough
Default

Some random thoughts...

**if** the payment is taxable / tax deductible (it is questionable for lump sum ss payments), then 5% is very little incentive, given that the payor might save 3-4% in tax by splitting the payment in 2 years. Then adjusting for 1.5% inflation, there's no reason to pay all now. Check marginal tax rates here TaxTips.ca - Ontario 2016 and 2017 Personal income tax brackets and tax rates

Also, if you write 2 separate agreements for 23+29, then you can pursue the first one in small claims court (25k limit).

What's to prevent the payor from paying just the minimum each month in perpetuum? Perhaps add a clause that you will enforce payment in full after 1 year.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.