Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Financial Issues

Financial Issues This forum is for discussing any of the financial issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 12:19 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 14
neverwhere is on a distinguished road
Default Case law - SS and personal finance mismanagement

I was trying to search on CanLII, but perhaps I wasn't using the correct search terms. Essentially, I'm looking for case law regarding spousal and personal finance mismanagement.

We have a situation where the ex is getting approximately close to $10k a month combined SS and CS. One child, 50-50 parenting yet she still receives full table amount and 100% of Section 7 expenses.

We are seeking a reduction and eventual SS termination. 6 year common law relationship, SS has been paid for 3+ years. It is the ex's position that she is in dire financial need and her spousal should increase.

From what we can tell, she has spent every penny that she received from CS/SS and from equity she had in the house (she received 75% of the equity). 6-8 vacation trips a year, a poor real estate investment, and we're not sure what else. This was not her standard of life when they were together.

Is there any case law that covers when the person on SS has essentially bankrupted themselves post-separation? Especially one who came out of the relationship with substantial assets? Any help would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 12:45 PM
arabian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 9,849
arabian will become famous soon enough
Default

At every stage of any court process both parties are required to complete financial statements.

It may be as simple as comparing financial statements from time of separation to current.

What is your material change of circumstance(s)?
Is there a review date specified in separation agreement?

I have not read anything anywhere where someone, who has previously been deemed to be entitled to SS, have SS stopped because they are a poor money manager.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 12:50 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 11
littlemonk is on a distinguished road
Default

How long are you ordered to pay SS? For a 6 year common law/marriage, it seems like you are seeing the light at the end of the tunnel (paid 3+years).
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 01:09 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 14
neverwhere is on a distinguished road
Default

Arabian, it's more due to her requesting an increase in SS due to the fact she overspent. Just wondering if there's any case law that addresses increases based upon overspending.

The review date was specified for earlier this year and didn't require a material change; awaiting her financials with her reply. We were in court previously but the issue of spousal was bifurcated and this is a new application. She didn't provide updated financials for 5 different case and settlement conferences, however she can not file her reply without it.

Her current financial position will be worse than when they split, as she has spent all of her savings and equity from the house.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 01:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 14
neverwhere is on a distinguished road
Default

Littlemonk, I'm typing for my partner as he's not a big online guy. Duration of support is not defined, there was a set review for last spring but she won't speak to him, or agree to mediation/arbitration so unfortunately we're back in court.

He is willing to pay her for a total of 7 years (reduced amount for the final 3), as he is trying to be fair. She believes she's entitled for a total of 14, or until the child turns 18. It's tough as she's self-represented, but hasn't done any research on quantum and duration.

We don't believe her reasons for an increase will fly, we just feel better when I can find case law.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 01:42 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 11
littlemonk is on a distinguished road
Default

In my opinion, a 7-year SS for a 6-year common law/marriage is MORE than fair. Your partner is a good person but unfortunately his ex is abusing his kindness.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 02:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 402
good_mom is on a distinguished road
Default

On a side note, if its 50/50 why is he paying 100%. is this due to her income being 0. Suggest, income input to her mins. wage, will not be much. She should be working to support her child(en).

I shake my head....when people can't even work to support their kids.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 02:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 14
neverwhere is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi good_mom; he tried being overly generous when they separated, and it only became shared parenting last year. We are going for an imputed income, and a resulting off-set CS. She worked before, so her historical income was quite high. It's baffling.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 02:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,900
rockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neverwhere View Post
Hi good_mom; he tried being overly generous when they separated, and it only became shared parenting last year. We are going for an imputed income, and a resulting off-set CS. She worked before, so her historical income was quite high. It's baffling.


Some people feel entitled and if someone can finance their life why not. Bonus points if it means screwing your ex over at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2016, 03:27 PM
arabian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 9,849
arabian will become famous soon enough
Default

some cases from Alberta which you may find interesting:

https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/do...&resultIndex=1

financial mismanagement by both parties (be careful what arrows you shoot):

https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/do...resultIndex=13

Here is one from Ontario (father claims mother is overspending):

https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/do...&resultIndex=4

Last edited by arabian; 11-10-2016 at 03:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Personal Injury Settlement - Family Law GoDiegoGo Divorce & Family Law 2 07-09-2013 07:47 PM
Case Conference and motions after SynGreis Parenting Issues 16 12-24-2012 10:30 AM
"Don't Panic" - What Defines Urgency Before the Court? Tayken Reference 85 11-13-2012 10:08 PM
Bet you haven't seen a case like this before... AlanSochan Divorce & Family Law 3 12-21-2011 02:34 AM
Interesting Case karmaseeker Divorce & Family Law 4 05-10-2011 08:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 PM.