Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Parenting Issues

Parenting Issues This forum is for discussing any of the parenting issues involved in your divorce, including parenting of step-children.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2006, 11:07 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,880
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default Intertesting Case - Child's Advocate Role

An interesting case in regards to the role of the child's advocate.

Basically the role of the advocate is defined. The advocate shall not be a witness in the case.

http://www.canlii.org/yk/cas/yksc/2004/2004yksc60.html

LV
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2006, 12:45 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Buried in paperwork
Posts: 467
Jeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to beholdJeff is a splendid one to behold
Default

That's a great find - thanks!
__________________
Ottawa Divorce
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2006, 02:12 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,880
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Jeff,

I thought it was interesting as it really defined the role of the children's lawyer - to be an advocate and not a witness in a case.

Paragraph 23 and 24

[23] Since 1992, child advocates have not filed written reports. Rather, they have followed the more traditional role of a lawyer representing a client, whether the child is capable of giving instructions not.

[24] The rule that counsel for children cannot give evidence, despite the relaxation of evidentiary rules in cases involving children, has a solid foundation. The Code of Conduct of the Canadian Bar Association, 1987, and the Code of Professional Conduct of the Law Society of Yukon, both state that the lawyer should not offer evidence and become a witness in a court case. The reason is clear. Once the lawyer gives evidence, he or she may be subject to cross-examination in the same manner as a witness. The lawyer may then no longer effectively advocate for the child. There may be circumstances where this rule is relaxed somewhat with the consent of counsel and the Court. See Strobridge v. Strobridge, [1994] O.J. No. 1247 (O.C.A.).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 AM.