Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2017, 10:22 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 36
sunnyday123 is on a distinguished road
Default

Hello,

I am sure ex understood access changed to every two Saturdays.

For instance, there is not one single Friday he came to pick up the child at school since the school started or since February 2017. With the previous access, he was supposed to pick up the child every two Fridays from school directly. We are in November and school started beginning of September for this year only.

So, I did not refuse access, because he was not even supposed to ask for the child from myself. He would pick him up from school. Is is a good example for why I believe he was convinced as myself access changed?

Another example would be the OCL report indicates access is every two Saturdays. It is true this is my own statement quoted by the OCL report. The OCL is however supposed to read the file and check, I suppose. Nobody contested that, not even my ex.

So, even if I do not have an order from the settlement conference, everything which happened after shows both parties understood access changed. Am I right? Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2017, 11:17 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,681
trinton has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Well if he hasn't showed up to pick up child from school, then how are you in contempt? Did you start showing up on Fridays earlier than him and not allow him to pickup ? Does school have any confirmation of him attending on Fridays to pickup child ? You might be able to just say that he stopped showing up on Fridays after a settlement conference given a judges comments.

OCL shouldn't be just quoting what you say. It must be confirmed by both parents. OCL isn't a trial judge and can't decide who is right and who is wrong. They can write their opinions but those opinions can be dismissed as hearsay.

If there was no order that stated access is changed to Saturdays, then it wasn't changed to saturdays.

My question is, was there ever a order that stated access is From Fridays? Why was it "reduced" to begin with ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Don't Panic" - What Defines Urgency Before the Court? Tayken Reference 85 11-13-2012 11:08 PM
Postponing Case Conference frustrateddad1970 Divorce & Family Law 2 06-18-2011 12:38 PM
where & how to go - after the 2nd settlement conference nick2009 Divorce & Family Law 2 08-05-2010 09:10 PM
Case Conference transcript available to parties involved? danny boy Divorce & Family Law 1 11-11-2008 06:49 PM
Settlement Conference Transcript and Judges Endorsement McBroke Divorce & Family Law 6 07-12-2006 09:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.