Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2008, 10:05 PM
OB1 OB1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 135
OB1 is on a distinguished road
Default Spousal Support ruling

Alberta court limits duration of spousal support
Last Updated: Monday, July 14, 2008 | 12:48 PM MT Comments25Recommend41CBC News
A Red Deer woman says women across the country should take note of a recent ruling from the Alberta Court of Appeal that sets limits on how long an ex-husband has to pay spousal support.

Jean Shields, 45, stayed at home to raise her two daughters during her 15-year marriage. After her divorce, a judge ordered her ex-husband, Ken Shields, to pay her $1,000 a month in ongoing spousal support retroactive to September 2001.

'You better be able to stay at home and then when it doesn't work out, you better get out there, and even though you managed to miss 10 years of being in a workforce.'
—Jean ShieldsJean Shields was a retail clerk before she got married, and now works full-time in a meat-packing plant earning $16 an hour. Her former spouse runs an oilfield company and earns about $132,000 a year.

This June, Ken Shields successfully appealed the spousal support order, arguing that Jean was adequately compensated through equal division of property and a lump sum of $17,700, to which they both agreed.

The appeal court justices limited the original order of indefinite payments to eight years, beginning from the day the marriage broke down.

They said the "chambers judge erred … in ordering spousal support of indefinite duration when a reasonable limitation on the duration of the spousal support was warranted."

The appeal court pointed out that the mother was only 34 years old at the time of the separation, and that eight years of spousal support is a "realistic time frame for the mother to be compensated for the economic disadvantage she sustained and to allow her to re-enter the job market in order to earn income leading toward financial self-sufficiency."

Ruling discourages homemakers, says lawyer
Jean Shields says the ruling isn't fair, and believes it sends the message that the work stay-at-home mothers do has little value.

"Just tells us females that you can do it all," she told CBC News on Monday. "You better be able to stay at home and then when it doesn't work out, you better get out there, and even though you managed to miss 10 years of being in a workforce."

Shields says she didn't have time to focus on a career while raising two kids.

Kevin Hannah, her lawyer, said the decision, which instructs lower courts in Alberta, is a setback for homemakers.

"If I read this decision of the Court of Appeal, I would be very reluctant to put myself in the position of being primarily responsible for the home and kids," he said.

But lawyer Dan Colborne, who represented Ken Shields, said the ruling doesn't say homemakers are not entitled to support, but it does state that those payments will not go on forever.

"Look, we're not going to simply rubber-stamp spousal support indefinitely, particularly if you're of good health [and] you're fairly young," he said of the decision.

Jean Shields said she wants to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, but she doesn't have enough money to fund the application.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 06:49 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,943
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Very interesting appeal decision...I wonder if the matter will be litigated further considering one party won't be happy with the outcome.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 06:48 PM
dadtotheend's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,644
dadtotheend will become famous soon enoughdadtotheend will become famous soon enough
Default

Too bad, so sad.

No one (except Mom) suggested that the work Mom did raising the kids wasn't valuable. Indeed, she is getting eight years of spousal support to compensate her. Why do some folks feel that they should be compensated indefinitely (read forever) when they are capable of retraining and working and have been granted EIGHT YEARS to do it? That's quite enough in my view.

There's a river in Russia, it's called the Crimea.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spousal Support - Why It Matters Divorcemanagement Political Issues 83 11-28-2013 10:38 AM
Spousal Support...good or bad.. jlalex General Chat 32 07-22-2010 06:33 PM
Spousal Support Question Fair4All Divorce & Family Law 8 05-04-2009 10:44 AM
Paying spousal support on $40 000 per year sammysdad Financial Issues 4 03-12-2007 11:04 AM
child and spousal support Catherine M Financial Issues 9 02-26-2007 06:32 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.