Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 10:53 AM
LovingFather32's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,518
LovingFather32 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rioe View Post
To me, this just follows her ex's pattern of only wanting the kids when he has time off work, instead of doing what normal parents do and parenting/working simultaneously.
But he asked for 50/50. So you dont make sense here. Perhaps other's should go back and reread her threads. Dad asked for 50/50 .. meaning he didn't only want the kids on his time off.

I know Ange now says he never wanted 50/50, but I think she forgets her previous posts, such as :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ange71727 View Post
In my case, the status quo is 65-35 custody which ex wants increased to 50-50 now after 8 years. I am opposed (for many reasons) and wondering if the sibling in the picture will mean anything to my case.
Angie said no to 50/50, stating things like:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ange71727 View Post
I have a hard time just saying here have your kids 50/50 after what he's been doing to me.
and

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ange71727 View Post
It makes me pretty reluctant to just give him what he wants
Angie KNOWS her ex wanted 50/50 and she KNOWS she said no. So let's stop the whole "he only wants the kids on his days off"..makes no sense.

Some of you choose to ignore her past posts and support Angie regardless of the twists and turns her story has taken over the months. I choose not to ignore these posts because it tells the whole story. If Ange had a pair of testicles I bet my bottom dollar she/he would be scorned by most here for making the wedding a huge issue...for denying an equal relationship .. for obsessing about his new g/f and her so called high maintenance and organizing her ex's life, etc.

Just for one second pretend it's a father doing all this .. boy this thread would be different. I love these forums but I call a spade a spade regardless of gender and I'm not afraid to point out inconsistencies when I see them.

"My ex is a dick...he cheated on me and now wants 50/50. I'm saying no to him after what he's done to me. I think that's a suitable punishment".

Forums: Yea..your ex is a dick. What a dick for asking for 50/50. What a dick for wanting his kids more, especially on his wedding..gahh such a dick.

Lts just dance around calling him a dick for wanting his kids more...Yayyy! Dickity Dick Dick Dickeroo

I know people in this world who do things that deserve all the name calling. Wanting to see your children more does not qualify in my books.

The reality Ange is that you knew you would make money by keeping him under the 40% threshold. The reality is that you're still pissed and holding grudges over your past relationship with him as evidenced by my quotes of your past posts above.

The reality Angie...is that you come here in order to gather other mothers who have hard feelings to sing the "my ex is a dick song" to validate your own subjective feelings. It's too bad others play along. If you were a father doing all of this...the same posters would have put you in your place months ago.

Last edited by LovingFather32; 10-11-2017 at 10:58 AM.
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 10:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,012
rockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

LF32 you need to reconcile the fact that her ex SAID he wanted 50/50 and filed paperwork to get it but then REFUSED 50/50 at the table. He only wanted 50/50 to reduce child support and when he looked at what 50/50 would involve he balked.

He only wanted to cut back his child support and felt the only way to do that was to demand 50/50.

There is a HUGE difference between DEMANDING and ASKING. He demanded 50/50 to start the process. They went to mediation and he stepped back from his 50/50 request. Then he added additional FINANCIAL demands.

Ange went to the mediation table -- at an additional expense -- not court. If she was serious about denying him 50/50 she wouldnt have gone to the table for so long and agreed to reduce cs even though the kids are still entitled.

If we are to believe everything people say at the beginning that isnt true then we should also believe your ex and her false allegations??
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:11 AM
LovingFather32's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,518
LovingFather32 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
If we are to believe everything people say at the beginning that isn't true then we should also believe your ex and her false allegations??
In the end you don't know if it's true. You dont know if Angie is telling the truth...you dont know if I was..you dont know if my ex was. But...we go by what's typed in posts...the facts. I had actual evidence that her allegations were false. You're just believing everything Angie says even when it makes zero sense and contradicts earlier posts. It's so surprising to me.

So when I hear things like...
Quote:
In my case, the status quo is 65-35 custody which ex wants increased to 50-50 now after 8 years. I am opposed (for many reasons) and wondering if the sibling in the picture will mean anything to my case.
(So saying HE WANTS 50/50...means she thinks he actually doesn't? Why didn't she write that then? Can this be cleared up for me?

She's even grasping at straws .. using the sibling thing to stop him from having 50/50. That itself illustrates how genuine she knew he was about 50/50....and she was downright frightened that he would get it....constantly asking us if we thought he had a strong case. I'm bewildered that only a few of us have caught on to this.

and

Quote:
I have a hard time just saying here have your kids 50/50 after what he's been doing to me.
Seems that she's not concerned that he's not serious...she's more concerned about him BEING serious about it and denying it.


Can somebody point out in this quote where it looks like Angie is questioning his seriousness for wanting 50/50? I cant see it. Know why? She knew he wasn't bluffing.
Then later that his lawyer even put his desire for 50/50 in writing...I know for a fact that he wanted it and that she said no. How do I know? SHE TOLD US over and over again. And she finally beat him into submission with her lovely status quo she's leaned on since day 1.

Quote:
There is a HUGE difference between DEMANDING and ASKING.
Trust me...my ex used this tactic also. Big bad LF32 DEMANDING 50/50. Demand this .. demand that. Just another court tactic to make the OP seem controlling. The guy wanted to see his kids more..just like I did.

The only one who looks demanding and controlling here is Ange. The guy cant even ask for his kids for his wedding. I can hardly wait to see what big deal and "he's a dick dance" awaits us next week.

Last edited by LovingFather32; 10-11-2017 at 11:32 AM.
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:31 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Alberta
Posts: 165
Soiled is on a distinguished road
Default

Won't somebody think of that poor dead horse?! It's becoming a flattened pile of mush LF has beaten it so much.

Need a bookie to start laying odds on how many pages one of Ange's threads will get before LF starts ranting about 50/50.
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:35 AM
LovingFather32's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,518
LovingFather32 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Actually Soiled, it was recently posted that he only wanted his children on his time off if you would take the time to read the thread (have you?)

So it's very relevant for me to revisit that he wanted them equally early on to counter that point.
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Alberta
Posts: 165
Soiled is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LovingFather32 View Post
Actually Soiled, it was recently posted that he only wanted his children on his time off if you would take the time to read the thread (have you?)

So it's very relevant for me to revisit that he wanted them equally early on to counter that point.
Yes, I'm sure you'll sway her, and change everything by starting your rants again. Make sure to pull up quotes from years ago!
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:47 AM
LovingFather32's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,518
LovingFather32 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soiled View Post
Yes, I'm sure you'll sway her, and change everything by starting your rants again. Make sure to pull up quotes from years ago!
Years ago? Is your concept of time doing okay?


I've actually given advice to Ange on this topic on the other page of this thread. (Clauses, time evening out, etc) I'm actually contributing. No need to troll on here when 50/50 come's out of my mouth.

What have your contributions/advice to the OP been to this thread Soiled? Just curious. Or are ya just trolling around with no advice to the OP?

Last edited by LovingFather32; 10-11-2017 at 11:51 AM.
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:51 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,681
trinton has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockscan View Post
this is a man who holds their settlement hostage every time they get close to settling
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockscan View Post
She wanted to know whether or not it was normal to HOLD UP THE PROCESS for ongoing requests.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockscan View Post
If anyone wants to continue the drama and drawn out process its her ex.

Please tell me again how it is "dickhead" who is holding up the settlement hostage here, and not the "cuntjob". Afterall, you just mentioned Ange wanted to know if it was "NORMAL" to hold up the final settlement as that is what she is doing. All she had to do was give so called dick head ONE week in the next DECADE and she would have had an agreement. His request to be able to schedule his wedding when he wants is very reasonable. Things like weddings get booked up fast and are sometimes hard to get dates you (or your ex) wants. But noo.. she just must have her ONE piece of gum returned to her. It is Ms. Cuntjob holding up the agreement here, not Mr. Dickhead.

Or perhaps, they are BOTH holding the settlement hostage here and you are biased against dad and I am biased against mom based on our own personal experiences ?

Last edited by trinton; 10-11-2017 at 11:54 AM.
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:53 AM
LovingFather32's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,518
LovingFather32 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trinton View Post
Please tell me again how it is dickhead who is holding up the settlement hostage here, and not the cuntjob. Afterall, you just mentioned Ange wanted to know if it was "NORMAL" to hold up the final settlement as that is what she is doing. All she had to do was give so called dick head ONE week in the next DECADE and she would have had an agreement. But noo.. she just must have her ONE piece of gum returned to her. It is Ms. Cuntjob holding up the agreement here, not Mr. Dickhead.

Or perhaps, they are BOTH holding the settlement hostage here and you are biased against dad and I am biased against mom based on our own personal experiences ?
Trinton.....dont say the Cu&* word man, you're better than that I hope.

I was raised by a single mom and women are my entire life...I detest that word.
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Alberta
Posts: 165
Soiled is on a distinguished road
Default

Perhaps not years ago, but you'll usually dig into her original posts and start quoting off that, so insert whatever the timeframe would be.

This thread was finished with anything relevant to the original post stated within the first page or two. After that it slowly became the usual slide towards you ranting about 50/50 and how she's the devil and denying that poor father everything.

If you truly want my 'take' on this whole show, I just had a wedding myself. Guess how we figured out the date to have it on? We looked at a calendar, determined the kids schedules, and then figured out a date that we would like, that also has the kids with us. Its simple, and this entire thread is exactly why lawyers make so much money from this crowd.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spousal support - payor having 2 jobs one full time one part Time jack123 Financial Issues 14 02-28-2017 01:53 PM
Faulty to assume Shared Parenting: here's why SilverLining Divorce & Family Law 44 06-29-2014 02:41 PM
What do you do after your kid leaves for their week with other parent? stripes Parenting Issues 64 07-10-2013 03:49 PM
make-up time cool river Divorce & Family Law 13 11-03-2012 12:10 AM
What to do when.... thefunone Parenting Issues 12 05-24-2012 04:35 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 AM.