Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2014, 09:46 AM
mcdreamy's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,414
mcdreamy is on a distinguished road
Default

The moment I posed the question, I realized I was asking for too much.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 164
Franklin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Everyone has a point and that,s when the law should take over most importantly without gender discrimination. Evidence and evidence only. No more here say for any one.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2014, 01:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,692
OrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Well I thought that if the children were removed from the family home that is considerd kidnapping.
A custodial parent is simply taking care of their children.

Quote:
So she removes them from the home and thats ok.
Was anything done about the move, or to reverse it?

Quote:
Would that be ok if ya man did that?
If there were no court Order stopping him, yes.

Quote:
Have youy called the police? I'm curious to know what they would do.
Unless there is a court Order - nothing.

Quote:
Question If I removed my kids from the family home what would happen next?
Reasonable people negotiate an access schedule, to determine who will see the children during what times.

Quote:
You know it is still not fair to children to place that kind of burden on a parent
Parents will care far more about their children than strangers do. What parent would want to leave their children's well-being up to a stranger?

Quote:
The moment I posed the question, I realized I was asking for too much.
Urban Dictionary: Dumbpiphany
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2014, 09:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 164
Franklin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

You are a fool for a link to DUMBPIPHANY . Do you really thjink I am an Idiot. I know the law is grey . Stupid man/woman, if one runs of with their child without a court order ,yes it is legal, fine . So the other parent finds the child and runs off with, yes, their child, and what did you post ? "to take care of them" when the other parent is , say not looking. And back and forth it goes. Go have a child or two, have that parent take off with them, see how you feel and grow up. Take your arrogant selfish superfluous misguided and very simplistic law advise and save it for someone who might pay you.

All your answers to my post were cooky cutter responses that I already had the answers too a hundred times over. I am looking for creative feed back and the inside scoop for the benefit of children. This is not not easily attained. I needed an international court called THE HAGE. I know you know this name but I know much more about this than you.

My point to being in this forum is to help others learn and for my future family law battles if I ever need to go back again.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2014, 09:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 164
Franklin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrleansLawyer View Post
A custodial parent is simply taking care of their children.


Was anything done about the move, or to reverse it?


If there were no court Order stopping him, yes.


Unless there is a court Order - nothing.


Reasonable people negotiate an access schedule, to determine who will see the children during what times.


Parents will care far more about their children than strangers do. What parent would want to leave their children's well-being up to a stranger?


Urban Dictionary: Dumbpiphany

Your link for your self . Read up on it . This describes you perfectly.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2014, 09:50 AM
Janibel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Way up North
Posts: 1,496
Janibel will become famous soon enough
Default

Franklin, if I'm not mistaken the Dumbpiphany comment was not directed at you. It seems to be for Paco ....
Happy Easter to you
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2014, 09:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener Ontario
Posts: 5,241
standing on the sidelines is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franklin View Post
Your link for your self . Read up on it . This describes you perfectly.
umm the link I thing was meant for paco. I could be wrong though.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2014, 10:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 164
Franklin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I was thinking the same thing but I had to go with my instincts on that one.
My sincere apologies if I have been mistaken.

Still I hope some of what I may have posted means something. Like that back and forth thing with the kids without an order. No one has to tell me a restraining order is the answer for the right party as sad as that is.
A responsible caring parent will stay away as to save the children the trauma. So the parent with the least amount of conscious wins.

Anyway , I know. Start my own thread.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2014, 03:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,692
OrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
law advise and save it for someone who might pay you.
DISCLAIMER:
Everything said in this, and any other, message is not intended to be taken as legal advice. I do not hold myself out to be a lawyer, adult or literate. Any resemblance this or any other message may have to legal advice or common sense is entirely coincidental. This message was generated through the combination of a monkey hitting a keyboard with a rock and advanced spell check software.

Quote:
A responsible caring parent will stay away as to save the children the trauma.
This is one reason for the boomerang effect in family law.

Quote:
I had to go with my instincts on that one.
My sincere apologies if I have been mistaken.
It was a comment made in response to the quote immediately preceding it. No offence was intended.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Claiming Legal Fees (Case Law) For Tax Deduction in Child Support Matters Tayken Financial Issues 51 09-15-2014 04:27 PM
Clipping Legal Aid's wings ByMyself Political Issues 9 12-06-2013 07:16 PM
Legal Aid's Wings?? SadAndTired Divorce & Family Law 13 09-19-2013 10:31 AM
Truism Exposed?: Legal Aid Ontario overwhelmed: Goar Tayken Divorce & Family Law 4 07-19-2013 01:38 PM
Legal Aid Ontario and Family Law – Their Role Tayken Political Issues 15 11-30-2012 11:51 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.