Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 04:12 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 84
Doctor Martins is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockscan View Post
You do realize that these clarification dates take up the courts time and push back legitimate cases for things like custody, child support, parenting time etc right? So because you dont want to be reasonable and take down a couple of videos you are now bumping cases that truly need an immediate answer just so you can have a judge waste their time saying take down all videos?

Which means that many of the other parents on here who are desperately waiting to get in front of a judge to get money or actual time with their kids are having to wait longer for people like you who cant simply say “maybe I should just err on the side of caution and assume its all”.

*smh*
14b is written motion and not seen in front of judge, just procedural asking through paperwork. Where I am located in Ontario there is no backlog I'm aware of and always been able to get a motion the next week after I file.

Im cool with a couple videos.. thats not what the written order states. It states all social media.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,975
rockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

Written motions still take the judges time away from other urgent motions!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 04:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 84
Doctor Martins is on a distinguished road
Default

Well if I don't have it clarified it literally means id have to take down all pictures and video of my daughter on all social media which even my ex knows thats not what the judge means but it was the end of the day and the order was written. The last motion i had there was hardly anyone else on the docket and in face we are the only motion that judge heard all day.. So your area might be different than mine. In any case it needs to be clarified as its too broad and means id have to take down every post of my daughter on all platforms including mostly family photos. Thats insane.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 04:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,975
rockscan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Martins View Post
Here is the problem. The judge in her order put this part in and said everything else was stayed until I complied.

Everything else is stayed until you comply with the order. Now you’re filing a clarification motion. Instead of wasting yours and other peoples time, just hold the videos, delete them, block them etc. until your next appearance for the original motion which is to get 50/50.

This is what others are trying to tell you as well—focus on the important part which is 50/50. Instead you mentioned a mobility clause, these videos and all the drama that your ex is causing.

Why waste the time and energy on the video stupidity when you could simply move forward with your stayed motion?
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 05:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener Ontario
Posts: 5,229
standing on the sidelines is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a question. You say that you are making money off the youtube videos through ads etc if I am correct. What financial compensation is your child getting from being in this type of thing and where is that money going to?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 06:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 84
Doctor Martins is on a distinguished road
Default

The majority of the videos I have on youtube do not involve my daughter. She's my only child so eventually ALL My money will go to her. Right now she is 3 and a half.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 07:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener Ontario
Posts: 5,229
standing on the sidelines is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Martins View Post
The majority of the videos I have on youtube do not involve my daughter. She's my only child so eventually ALL My money will go to her. Right now she is 3 and a half.
you cannot say that with totally certainty unless you have had a vasectomy that worked. You may have more kids in the future.

Your ex may use the argument that you are using the child to line your own pockets. Yes she may only be in a few but you are paid for that. If I was you I would start up an RESP or something and put the money your child should be paid into it. That way you can say that you are earmarking the money the child earns to provide for her future. That way you are not making money off your child.

I know if I was the mom and I knew my ex was using the child to make money and keep it for his own use I would be pissed to. By putting the childs earnings into an investement or whatever in the childs name then the child is benifiting and not you. I am just trying to think outside the box a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 07:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 84
Doctor Martins is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by standing on the sidelines View Post
you cannot say that with totally certainty unless you have had a vasectomy that worked. You may have more kids in the future.

Your ex may use the argument that you are using the child to line your own pockets. Yes she may only be in a few but you are paid for that. If I was you I would start up an RESP or something and put the money your child should be paid into it. That way you can say that you are earmarking the money the child earns to provide for her future. That way you are not making money off your child.

I know if I was the mom and I knew my ex was using the child to make money and keep it for his own use I would be pissed to. By putting the childs earnings into an investement or whatever in the childs name then the child is benifiting and not you. I am just trying to think outside the box a bit.

Well as of right now she wants me to shut down everything. Basically i shouldn't operate a business in general but should pay her uncontrollable amounts of child support that comes off of trees. Also I'm not putting my daughter in future videos .. unless she wants to when she is old enough to make up her own mind. she was having fun doing it.. And good luck these days stopping kids from social media.. as soon as they get a phone they go crazy with instagram and snapchat these days.. and I'm sure technology will make this worse.. my 3 year old already knows how to select videos on youtube and which ones she wants to watch etc.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 08:45 PM
mcdreamy's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,413
mcdreamy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Martins View Post
Well as of right now she wants me to shut down everything. Basically i shouldn't operate a business in general but should pay her uncontrollable amounts of child support that comes off of trees. Also I'm not putting my daughter in future videos .. unless she wants to when she is old enough to make up her own mind. she was having fun doing it.. And good luck these days stopping kids from social media.. as soon as they get a phone they go crazy with instagram and snapchat these days.. and I'm sure technology will make this worse.. my 3 year old already knows how to select videos on youtube and which ones she wants to watch etc.
Really? I have no problem whatsoever in stopping a 3yr old with engaging in social media. Albeit, I also never gave my 3yr a phone.

I'm curious... for you, at what age does "make up her own mind, having fun doing it" actually kick in?
__________________
if you attack everyone involved, the common denominator is you. Attributed to OL
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2017, 08:48 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 84
Doctor Martins is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdreamy View Post
Really? I have no problem whatsoever in stopping a 3yr old with engaging in social media. Albeit, I also never gave my 3yr a phone.

I'm curious... for you, at what age does "make up her own mind, having fun doing it" actually kick in?
I agree with you actually on this point. The videos I was putting her in were things like where we video taped a birthday party.. learn colours with paw patrol.. etc. it was fun..

As far as kids having a phone and own social media personally i think they should be a teenager..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
judges order, motions, shared parenting, youtube


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spousal/Child Support Question Jenny Divorce & Family Law 6 10-01-2013 01:01 AM
How to change Interim Restraining Order??? kp300 Divorce & Family Law 2 09-21-2013 12:52 PM
Without prejudice in Final order? SingingDad Divorce & Family Law 9 01-28-2013 07:27 PM
How far do Grandparent rights go? sasha1 Divorce & Family Law 13 02-13-2011 01:46 PM
The Concept: Standard of living gooddadgoingmad Divorce & Family Law 7 02-20-2006 10:59 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.