Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 05:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12
daver32 is on a distinguished road
Default conflict of interest

We have just ended a 10 year CL relationship. We had still lived together for a year until the house was sold.

She acquired a lawyer for the sale of the house. So he was representing the two of use in the sale of the house which is in both our names.

When I went with her to sign the final house documents after everything was signed he presents me with a proposal letter for a separation agreement. So while he was representing the two of us with the sale of the house he was also representing her with drafting a separation agreement.

At the time my ex needed some release of some funds from the sale of the house to pay for bills. I agreed as the amount was going to be given to both of us. I did not sign anything about that. The lawyer says he would prepare the documents required to be signed for the release of the funds. Later I thought I should not make things easier for her and I should decide against the release of funds. I called her lawyer up and he says the funds were released to her as we had a verbal agreement. I have yet picked up my funds. He also claims the funds will be withheld until the agreement is made. If I pick up the cashier check he wants me to sign a receipt for the check and a document saying that the funds will be held by him until the separation agreement is final. She was probably signed this already.

Is this a conflict of interest as this lawyer was representing the two of us with the sale of the house while representing her against me with regards to the separation agreement? At the same time he is withholding the funds from being equally distributed to us even though I did not sign a document saying he should be doing this.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:18 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,880
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Daver32,

You raise some good points in your question. See the similar situation in the matter of Serniak v. Teitel, 2003 CanLII 42753 (ON S.C.) where the court dealt with the issue if breach of fiduciary duty. In the result the court held that the solitor was in breach. At paragraph 12 of the Judgement:

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc...nlii42753.html


and Appeal ramifications can be found here:

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc...anlii9130.html

lv
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting Article on Joint Custody Grace Political Issues 23 03-20-2012 10:35 AM
Interest Duped Divorce & Family Law 3 12-11-2006 07:32 AM
He replied HELP ASAP!!!!!!! littleman Divorce & Family Law 24 05-10-2006 03:53 PM
Pushing for costs a conflict of interest? sasha1 Divorce & Family Law 19 12-28-2005 11:10 PM
If Yesterday was Today-Best interest of the child bearall Divorce & Family Law 1 12-23-2005 01:17 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.