Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law > Common Law Issues

Common Law Issues The law regarding common law relationships is different than in cases of divorce. Discuss the issues that affect unmarried couples here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2015, 11:27 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: niagara region
Posts: 37
viewfromthecheapseats is on a distinguished road
Default settlement offer accepted

It would appear that a settlement offer has been accepted.

200.00 a month compensatory SS until age 67. No child support ordered. He pays all costs of her bankruptcy within six months. No unjust enrichment claim. All property issued to be considered settled. No order for costs.

She is now engaged to be married. I think this is now put to bed.

Thank you everyone for all the great info.

We have appreciated everything we have learned through your sharing of experiences and insights. Just waiting for it all to be formalized.

viewfromthecheapseats.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2015, 11:48 AM
Hand of Justice
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: In the Shadows
Posts: 3,143
Links17 is on a distinguished road
Default

I assume all those items are listed as to what they are:
costs of bankcruptcy = Xxxx$

things like "all the costs of her bankruptcy" are yucky

etc....
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2015, 02:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: niagara region
Posts: 37
viewfromthecheapseats is on a distinguished road
Default

Unfortunately not Links17. I let him know ambiguity in a court order can come back to bite you but he says they verbally agreed it was for the cost of filing for bankruptcy. It was explained to him that the agreement could be read as to include any monthly payments or unforeseen debt. He just wanted it over with. What's done is done I guess.

Last edited by viewfromthecheapseats; 03-02-2015 at 02:37 PM. Reason: correcting misspelling
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2015, 06:16 PM
Hand of Justice
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: In the Shadows
Posts: 3,143
Links17 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by viewfromthecheapseats View Post
Unfortunately not Links17. I let him know ambiguity in a court order can come back to bite you but he says they verbally agreed it was for the cost of filing for bankruptcy. It was explained to him that the agreement could be read as to include any monthly payments or unforeseen debt. He just wanted it over with. What's done is done I guess.
Haha, you reap what you sow I guess, he'll have nobody to blame but himself. I hope he retains notes or anything else to help illuminate a judge in the future on the matter.

In these matters judges tend to bias towards the lower income party.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anybody ever used a lawyer off of justicenet.ca? DontGiveUp Divorce & Family Law 18 06-06-2014 03:24 PM
counter offers ringettteplayer Divorce & Family Law 8 06-29-2013 01:15 AM
Stock Equity Pursuinghappiness Financial Issues 37 06-06-2013 01:02 PM
Motion to sell home & Offers to Settle Dee1973 Divorce & Family Law 8 04-08-2013 05:25 PM
Motion to change Nadia Divorce & Family Law 11 03-02-2013 10:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.