Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law > Common Law Issues

Common Law Issues The law regarding common law relationships is different than in cases of divorce. Discuss the issues that affect unmarried couples here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2011, 05:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 148
shellshocked22 is on a distinguished road
Default

Lawyers and even accountants get confused over the various tax credits. A lot depends on the custody arrangement. It used to be that the one who paid support couldn't claim it (my , what a coincidence, another way to screw fathers !). However, if you have shared custody, and BOTH pay CS (ie. via offset) you each get 50% of the credit. Makre sure the Sep Agmt is clear on this, you need precise wording

For equivalent to spouse, you have to agree cause if you don't and you both claim, then no one gets it. With only one child, maybe you can each claim her half the year ? NOt sure. Equiv to spouse = about $2200 in your pocket !!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2011, 06:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,630
billm is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shellshocked22 View Post
...However, if you have shared custody, and BOTH pay CS (ie. via offset) you each get 50% of the credit. Makre sure the Sep Agmt is clear on this, you need precise wording...
Can you give an example of the precise wording?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2011, 06:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 148
shellshocked22 is on a distinguished road
Default

There was a post on this recently, sorry I'm not good at providing "links". However, the "gist" of it is that the agreement needs to CLEARLY show that each spouse pays CS and the amounts are offset.

One poster had it declined, even though he satisfied the criteria, because his SA simply said he paid X (which WAS the offset amount but didn't clearly spell it out).

I would have the SA clearly show each sides pay CS and the higher income earner pays the "offset" amount. In fact, I would have the SA actually say Mary earns $25K and pays $400 in month is CS. Bill earns $100k and would pay $1500 as per CS tables. Bill will pay an offset amount of $1500 - $400 = $1100 with a further clause showing how it will be updated each tax year.

I would strongly have a GOOD accountant review it. The Rev Canada rules with respect to "shared custody" in particular have changed a great deal lately.

Good "gene colman's" website; he has some good articles on it.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2011, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 148
shellshocked22 is on a distinguished road
Default

Sorry typo on above, should be "google" gene colman's website
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2011, 04:17 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 52
Marcos is on a distinguished road
Default Still Confused About Common-Law Separation Agreements

Question:

If i present my partner with a Separation Agreement (i.e A letter stating some terms) -

1. Does it need to be notarized? If she signs it, does it make it legal?
2. I heard i can submit to a court as "contract" on record if we both agree to it and sign it.
3. What type of letter do i need to give her to have her leave my house?
4. If she agrees to splitting the time to Every other weekend and one day a week access for her and being able to both make the life changing decisions, do we still need a court to award custody?

Thanks, anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2011, 04:50 PM
Mess's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,917
Mess is on a distinguished road
Default

You both need to get independent legal advice (each take it to your own lawyer) and have each lawyer sign off on it for it to be iron clad. Otherwise she can contest it later.

Each lawyer signing it with each of you (*you should end up with 4 copies with 4 signatures, the lawyers keep a copy on file) is good enough, the notary doesn't really mean anything. If she doesn't get independent legal advice, just a notaray won't give you any protection from her trying to reopen it.

That said, if you have an access schedule with the children and abide by it for 6 months, you will be in a status quo situation and it would be very difficult to change the children's schedule, if not impossible. If the children are doing well a court would not change the schedule just because one parent changed their minds. If there is a material change in circumstance, the custody/access can be challenged no matter how iron-clad the agreement is.

If you equalize any property/assets properly, there is nothing to reopen.

Child support should be paid according to tables. If it is not, the agreement can still be reopened later, child support will almost always be set by the courts according to table amounts.

The main tricky thing you want to lock down is spousal support. If your ex (or you) has no possible entitlement then you are good.

Many couples do quite well without lawyers or court orders.

If you each get independent legal advice and the lawyers sign the agreement, then you can have the separation agreement registered with the courts or, more easily, incorporated into the divorced order. Talk to the court clerk or duty counsel about this.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2011, 05:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 57
tombiosis is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi
haven't posted in a long while...but your OP reminded me of what I went through...many moons ago...
I had a friend who was a family law lawywer at the time. He advised me to "write my own" sep ag. and then take it to a lawyer when it was agreeable to both parties.
I got a few sample agreements to guide me...and worked many hours on it. I would email drafts to my child's mom, and then we would discuss problems via emails...Once we figured we had everything covered, we split the cost ($750) to have it put on legal letterhead and witnessed etc...we had a few issues that were tough, like who would actually move out. I agreed to move as long as I got the access i wanted, namely 50% minimum, with no support going either way. I ended up losing a sizezable chunk of the equity I had built in the house, but I have no regrets about that.
I guess the main point I want to hammer home here is twofold...
1- Do all your negotiating ahead of time before getting lawyers involved, or they may end up taking most or all of your equity.
and
2
this is really important....
The day will come when you will be friends with her again...you will see. I was adamant that that would never happen in my case...but it did! Its all about your child, and that child needs both parents. Remember that always.

I recall reading a book at the time, and I have never forgotten something in it.
"Make all decisions in the best interest of the child, and you will never go wrong"...so far that has been the best advice I ever received.

It isn't easy, and takes time, but someday you will look back proudly on the way you handled things if you follow that advice.
Peace
T
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2011, 05:49 PM
MiViLaLoco's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 55
MiViLaLoco is on a distinguished road
Default

The $$ impact depends on the level of income.

It is my understanding that this "after-tax" income benefit should be taken into consideration for child support.

For example: In our agreement (which is shared 50/50 custody) we have a clause which states I will always claim our child as "equivalent to spouse". This is there because "technically" we both pay support to each other.

When it comes to doing income taxes this can mean a difference of approx $1 - 2 thousand back a year...depending on my income that year. So...when I do my taxes I quickly do 2 calucations...one with claiming the "equavelent to spouse" and one without. I print off both forms (as I use tax software) and claim the difference as "income" when caluculating what my CS is going to be that year. I also claim the CTB and the $100 a month grant as income as well...for CS purposes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cohabitation agreement boundaries proactive Common Law Issues 1 07-01-2011 09:36 AM
how to deal with ex's offer to settle nick2009 Divorce & Family Law 19 09-20-2010 10:47 PM
Desperately need help! My Separated ex has not signed agreement in past 2 years maple_2009 Financial Issues 4 11-10-2009 08:53 AM
Seperation Agreement Problems NightEcho Divorce & Family Law 5 10-09-2009 06:28 AM
When is a SEPARATION AGREEMENT an Agreement dvr Divorce & Family Law 1 06-15-2006 06:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.