Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law > Common Law Issues

Common Law Issues The law regarding common law relationships is different than in cases of divorce. Discuss the issues that affect unmarried couples here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2010, 01:17 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
bb282121 is on a distinguished road
Unhappy Ontario 3 years rule

hope someone can help... found this on the net, and i wonder if it's accurate:

quote
In Ontario, the Ontario Family Law Act specifically recognizes common-law spouses in sec. 29, dealing with spousal support issues; the requirements are living together for no less than three years[8] or having a child in common and having "cohabitated in a relationship of some permanence". The three years must be continuous, although a breakup of a few days during the period will not affect a person's status as common-law. No married person may become eligible to begin the three year "countdown" to have a recognized common law spouse until divorce from the first spouse occurs.
end quote

if someone knows for sure ( I'm asking specifically on the not divorced from other part), pls advise.

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:17 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,880
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Family Law Act at Section 1

Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3

Quote:
Definitions

1. (1) In this Act,

“child” includes a person whom a parent has demonstrated a settled intention to treat as a child of his or her family, except under an arrangement where the child is placed for valuable consideration in a foster home by a person having lawful custody; (“enfant”)

“child support guidelines” means the guidelines established by the regulations made under subsections 69 (2) and (3); (“lignes directrices sur les aliments pour les enfants”)

“cohabit” means to live together in a conjugal relationship, whether within or outside marriage; (“cohabiter”)

“court” means the Ontario Court of Justice, the Family Court of the Superior Court of Justice or the Superior Court of Justice; (“tribunal”)

“domestic contract” means a domestic contract as defined in Part IV (Domestic Contracts); (“contrat familial”)

“parent” includes a person who has demonstrated a settled intention to treat a child as a child of his or her family, except under an arrangement where the child is placed for valuable consideration in a foster home by a person having lawful custody; (“père ou mère”)

“paternity agreement” means a paternity agreement as defined in Part IV (Domestic Contracts); (“accord de paternité”)

“spouse” means either of two persons who,
(a) are married to each other, or
(b) have together entered into a marriage that is voidable or void, in good faith on the part of a person relying on this clause to assert any right. (“conjoint”) R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, s. 1 (1); 1997, c. 20, s. 1; 1999, c. 6, s. 25 (1); 2005, c. 5, s. 27 (1, 2); 2006, c. 19, Sched. C, s. 1 (1, 2, 4).

Appears to be an err in the wikpedia entry...especially considering Section 2:
Quote:
Polygamous marriages
(2) In the definition of “spouse”, a reference to marriage includes a marriage that is actually or potentially polygamous, if it was celebrated in a jurisdiction whose system of law recognizes it as valid. R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, s. 1 (2).
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2010, 05:49 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4
bb282121 is on a distinguished road
Default

mmmm? I probably didn"t explain enough...

person A and B have lived together for 4 years (common law) but person A was still married to person C for 2 of the first year of that cohabitation. Does this mean that A and B have a time of cohabitation of 2 years valid counting toward the 3 years common law spouse status?

Is Poligamy recognised valid in Ontario? Ottawa?

Thanks for your input.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-31-2010, 08:08 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,880
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb282121 View Post
mmmm? I probably didn"t explain enough...

person A and B have lived together for 4 years (common law) but person A was still married to person C for 2 of the first year of that cohabitation. Does this mean that A and B have a time of cohabitation of 2 years valid counting toward the 3 years common law spouse status?

Is Poligamy recognised valid in Ontario? Ottawa?

Thanks for your input.
Lol, to me what it means is the couple, A and B, have been living common-law for about four years estranged from their married spouse for about half. It's not uncommon considering.

Poligamy is recognized in Canada under Section 293 of the CC.


Welcome to the forum.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Separation Agreement - Pension valuation. wmike Divorce & Family Law 4 11-19-2009 06:30 AM
When Do You Calculate Child Support Based On Average of Last 3 Years? #1StepMom Divorce & Family Law 39 09-17-2009 05:02 PM
He's been gone for years... representingself Divorce & Family Law 4 08-24-2009 09:10 AM
Barrie, Ontario Rally 2008 - Pre-Register Now! logicalvelocity Political Issues 0 04-21-2008 09:51 PM
Ontario law must apply in Family Arbitrations lammie Divorce & Family Law 0 11-20-2005 09:29 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM.