Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law > Common Law Issues

Common Law Issues The law regarding common law relationships is different than in cases of divorce. Discuss the issues that affect unmarried couples here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2016, 04:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,692
OrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
I would think that in a case in which your inheritance was used to buy and renovate a house for both of you, it would be difficult to make the case that you had suffered a loss
Inheritance funds were lost.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2016, 05:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,838
stripes is on a distinguished road
Default

But were they lost? It sounds like the funds went into paying for a home in which the OP and his ex lived for nine (?) years, so both the OP and his ex realized a benefit from those funds. My understanding of unjust enrichment in the common-law context is that one party has to suffer a loss which corresponds to a benefit to the other party, as a result of resources transferred from the first party to the second party - e.g. A takes over paying for B's school loans; B uses the money he saved by not making loan payments to buy stocks in his name only, which he keeps at the end of the relationship. The benefits to B (acquiring stocks with extra money) correspond directly to the loss to A (because A didn't realize any benefit from paying off B's student loan). I think it is trickier when both parties are benefiting, as in the case of a shared residence.

Of course I am not a lawyer, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2016, 10:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,692
OrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the roughOrleansLawyer is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
My understanding of unjust enrichment in the common-law context is that one party has to suffer a loss which corresponds to a benefit to the other party, as a result of resources transferred from the first party to the second party
Loss to OP: Inheritance funds are lost
Benefit to Ex: Increased value of asset
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
down payment, family home, inheritance


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motion to sell home & Offers to Settle Dee1973 Divorce & Family Law 8 04-08-2013 05:25 PM
No matrimonial home in this case??!! jenni989 Divorce & Family Law 5 01-26-2012 07:41 AM
what happens when the matramonial home is downsized? ddol1 Financial Issues 0 11-05-2011 07:24 PM
Home Ownership Matrimonial Home? epinecone Financial Issues 11 11-08-2010 10:28 PM
Forcing Sale of Home SelfishEx Divorce & Family Law 19 07-19-2010 09:17 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.